2008
DOI: 10.1163/156855208x293817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the Wall Effect on Particle Packing Structure Using X-ray Micro Computed Tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 shows the translational order results for l ≥ 5. The results for l ≤ 5 are less reliable since the number of particle relations is too limited for a sound statistical analysis, and furthermore finite size and wall effects play an important role [18,20,27,28]. Two outliers can be observed in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…7 shows the translational order results for l ≥ 5. The results for l ≤ 5 are less reliable since the number of particle relations is too limited for a sound statistical analysis, and furthermore finite size and wall effects play an important role [18,20,27,28]. Two outliers can be observed in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This can be related to a possible wall type effect, in which granular particles near a rigid wall boundary show higher porosity. For a granular material, the distance over which the local porosity is affected was estimated to be about 4-5 average particle size diameters from a vertical sample wall [42]. However, for fibre-reinforced soils, De Larrard [43] estimated the perturbed zone from the face of rigid cylindrical fibres mixed with a granular soil (having an average particle size diameter of the same order of magnitude of the fibre diameter) to be much smaller, about 10% of the average particle size.…”
Section: Sample Porosity Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can suspect, however, that this value is strongly influenced by the so-called wall effect. The container wall affects a local packing structure of particles and the porosity near the wall is higher than in the centre of the container [28]. This decreases the value of the average bulk density calculated for the powder specimen.…”
Section: Simulation Of Powder Compaction In a Cylindrical Diementioning
confidence: 98%