Study of the variability of the response to inbreeding for meat production in Merino sheep

Abstract

Introduction Inbreeding is known to affect metric traits. Reduction of additive genetic variance, as well as phenotypic values are its most significant deleterious effects. Yet the emergence of disorders due to recessive gene action constitutes another important aspect. Despite the fact that some effect of inbreeding can be positively used in selection schemes (T oro 1993), breeders are aware of the deleterious effects and try to avoid them. This is particularly true when the selection nucleus and the related population are of small size. Several authors (H agger 1991; V errier et al. 1993; W ray and G oddard 1994) have stressed that the application of sophisticated methods of selection, particularly BLUP‐based techniques (H enderson 1973) is to be reconsidered in the light of inbreeding effects. Comparisons of selection methods should therefore account for inbreeding depression (T oro and P jrez‐E nciso 1990; Q uinton et al. 1992). Other authors believe that inbreeding depression is not so important, at least in the meat production industry (G ama and S mith 1993) for traits with high heritabilities. Nevertheless, the net effect of inbreeding in a selection programme will depend on the magnitude of the selection response relative to the depression due to the accumulated inbreeding. Depending on whether genetic gain and inbreeding depression compensate for each other, the level of inbreeding of the animals may need to be accounted for in the selection process (K eller et al. 1989; R oehe et al. 1993; K lieve et al. 1994; B risbane and G ibson 1995). On the other hand, the response to inbreeding is not the same for all animals. There is an important range of variation for the estimates of inbreeding depression reported in the literature (e.g. L amberson and T homas 1984). Differences in such a response with respect to identifiable sources of variation should be examined. The objective of this work was to study the relationship between the depression due to inbreeding and litter size of ewes and weights of lambs; and to identify sources of a possible differential response to inbreeding between animals coming from different genetic line, sex, or type of birth.

Inbreeding and inbreeding depression on body weight in sheep

“…Norberg and Sorensen (2007) showed that birth weight of three breeds (Texel, Shropshire, Oxford Down) decreased respectively by 0.011, 0.0082 and 0.0088 kg per 1% inbreeding. Similar results for body weight were obtained by Analla et al (1999). However, Lamberson et al (1982) found positive inbreeding infl uences on birth weight and 60-day weight.…”

“…It corresponds with the results given by Mandal et al (2006) for Muzaffarnagari sheep over an extended period of time. Analla et al (1999) estimated average inbreeding for six lines to be between 1.4 and 5.3%. Also estimates of average inbreeding coeffi cients found by MacKinnon (2003) ranged from 2.2 to 3.8%.…”

Temporal changes in allele frequency, genetic variation and inbreeding depression in small populations of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata

“…The linear relationship between salinity tolerance and inbreeding coefficient suggests that inbreeding depression for salinity tolerance is caused by additive gene action among the loci responsible for inbreeding depression (Shikano et al . 2000a), as similarly reported in various fitness‐related traits of animals and plants (Falconer, 1989; Hauser & Loeschcke, 1995; Analla et al ., 1999). Thus, the use of salinity tolerance as an index of inbreeding depression allowed us to obtain precise information about the changes in the amount of inbreeding depression during successive generations in the closed lines.…”

Sex-differential effects of inbreeding on overwinter survival, birth date and mass of bighorn lambs

“…, 1992a,b,c). Numerous studies found that inbreeding reduced birthweight of sheep (Boujenene & Chami, 1997; Analla et al. , 1999; Rzewuska et al.…”