2001
DOI: 10.1007/s002170100391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the total replacement of egg by white lupine protein, emulsifiers and xanthan gum in yellow cakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
50
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
7
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two-way ANOVA also revealed a significant effect of both BCF and XG on muffin height (Table 2). Arozarena et al (2001) also reported an increase in height of eggless yellow cakes with the addition of XG. In addition, muffin height and specific volume were positively related with each other, and also with L*, a* and b* of crusts and crumbs as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Specific Volume and Heightmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Two-way ANOVA also revealed a significant effect of both BCF and XG on muffin height (Table 2). Arozarena et al (2001) also reported an increase in height of eggless yellow cakes with the addition of XG. In addition, muffin height and specific volume were positively related with each other, and also with L*, a* and b* of crusts and crumbs as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Specific Volume and Heightmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…With consumers actively searching for healthier food options with no sacrifice for its taste and appearance, food manufacturers constantly look for alternatives of egg in food manufacture. The trials of substitutes of eggs in cake products, such as total replacement with white lupine protein, emulsifiers, and xanthan gum in yellow cakes (Arozarena et al 2001), and bovine plasma protein in high yield white cakes (Lee et al 1993;Myhara and Kruger 1998;Raeker and Johnson 1995), were not successful in replacing egg's attribute and contribution in foaming. The egg white protein is critical for foaming in the angel food cake (Abu-Ghoush et al 2010;McWilliams 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 ; time ϭ 120 min; temperature ϭ 35°C; G ϭ grafting ratio; A ϭ add-on concentration; C ϭ conversion; E ϭ grafting efficiency; H ϭ homopolymer concentration; R g ϭ rate of grafting.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The graft copolymer was characterized according to the following parameters: [13][14][15] Grafting ratio (%) 3 ; time ϭ 120 min; temperature ϭ 35°C; G ϭ grafting ratio; A ϭ add-on concentration; C ϭ conversion; R g ϭ rate of grafting; E ϭ grafting efficiency; H ϭ homopolymer concentration). 3 ; time ϭ 120 min; temperature ϭ 35°C; G ϭ grafting ratio; A ϭ add-on concentration; C ϭ conversion; E ϭ grafting efficiency; H ϭ homopolymer concentration; R g ϭ rate of grafting.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%