2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-8776-8_52
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the Tip Surface Morphology of Glass Micropipettes and Its Effects on Giga-Seal Formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Optical and electron microscope images of patches show that membrane and pipette are in close contact, but they do not show the surface topography involved in seal formation [ 20 , 21 ]. Surface roughness of glass micropipettes is reported in the literature to play an important role in giga-seal formation [ 11 - 13 , 22 , 23 ]. Normally, pipettes are fire polished before experiments to make rough tips smoother.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Optical and electron microscope images of patches show that membrane and pipette are in close contact, but they do not show the surface topography involved in seal formation [ 20 , 21 ]. Surface roughness of glass micropipettes is reported in the literature to play an important role in giga-seal formation [ 11 - 13 , 22 , 23 ]. Normally, pipettes are fire polished before experiments to make rough tips smoother.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent development in microengineering and nanosciences has found many applications of micro/nanopipettes, such as generating microdroplets [ 8 ], single-molecule fluorescence tracking [ 2 ], creating nanoscale features by nanolithography and nanowriting methods [ 9 ], and nanosensing in scanning probe microscopy [ 10 ]. Although there are many studies in the literature on the shapes and geometries of pipettes [ 1 , 6 , 11 - 15 ], there are no reports about numerical analysis on the effect of pulling parameters on surface roughness properties of glass micropipettes. This information is important in applications which require direct contact of pipette and samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental equipment setup consisted of an Axon multiclamp 700B microelectrode amplifier (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA), Flaming/Brown No surface roughness could be identified after milling, so the surface roughness should be smaller than the resolution of the SEM image, which is 4.5 nm [2] micropipette puller (Model P-97, Sutter Instruments) and glass micropipettes (BF150-86-10, Sutter Instruments). The puller machine was set to produce pipettes with a tip size of approximately 1.5 μm.…”
Section: Patch Clamping Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3D reconstruction methods of surface topography, necessary to obtain roughness parameters, can be divided into two principal categories: 1) Stereoscopy, in which a SEM image stereo pair is used. The stereo pair can be obtained by deflecting the electron beam, but it is generally implemented by tilting the specimen stage (Lane, 1969(Lane, , 1972Stampfl et al, 1996;Davies and Randle, 2001;Huang et al, 2004;Bonetto et al, 2006;Ponz et al, 2006;Jahnisch and Fatikow, 2007;Marinello et al, 2008;Ostadi et al, 2009;Malboubi et al,2009;Fatikow et al, 2009;Azevedo and Marques, 2010;Chen et al, 2010;Ostadi et al, 2010). Both, observation of 3D images and measurement of 3D height data are possible.…”
Section: ) Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%