Study of the Strongly Excited2+and3−States in the

Calculation and evaluation of cross-sections for p+54,56,57,58,natFe reactions up to 250MeV

“…The comparison of calculated results for inelastic scattering angular distributions of the first excited state with experimental data [39,41,46,47,55,58] for 56 Fe is given in Fig. 9 at different incident proton energies.…”

“…The calculated results are in good agreement with experimental data. The calculated results of elastic scattering angular distributions for p+ 54 Fe reactions are compared with experimental data [33,34,37,39,41,42,46,[49][50][51][52][53][54] based on this set of optical model potential parameter obtained here. The calculated results are in very good agreement with experimental data as shown in Figs.…”

“…The comparison of calculated results for inelastic scattering angular distributions of the first excited state with experimental data [39,41,47,51,52,[54][55][56] for 54 Fe shows that the calculated results are in good agreement with experimental data, except for incident proton energy 6.0 MeV. The calculated results of inelastic scattering angular distributions of the fifth excited state for 54 Fe are in agreement with experimental data [41,47,51,54,56,57], while for incident proton energies 17.2, 17.9 and 40.0 MeV, the calculated results are lower than experimental data, and experimental data [54] at 40.0 MeV are far off from the systematic tendency of experimental data with increasing energy.…”

“…The comparison of calculated results of elastic scattering angular distributions with experimental data [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] for p+ 56 Fe reaction is given in Figs. 3-5. The calculated results are in good agreement with experimental data.…”

Fluctuations in inelastic proton scattering from58Ni in the energy range 17.1 to 20.6 MeV

“…The contaminant groups prevented the measurement of S SNi inelastic proton yields at some energies. Absolute differential cross sections were obtained by normalizing to the 90 ~ elastic scattering data of Eccles et al, [8] which were obtained at 18.6 MeV incident proton energy with a resolution of 200 keV. An absolute error of _+10% is quoted for their result.…”