2014
DOI: 10.4103/0975-2870.135256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the role of mobile phones in the transmission of Hospital acquired infections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, MRSA was detected in 53% of the samples, followed by CoNS (50%), Bacillus (43%), diphtheroids (30%), MSSA (185%), E. coli and Viridans streptococci (13% each), micrococci (10%), Klebsiella pneumoniae and ESBL Klebsiella pneumoniae (8% each) and finally Acinetobacter baumanii and Candida (3% each). A nearly similar result was reported by Angadi et al (2014) where MRSA was isolated from 53.3% of HCWs mobile phones [ 7 ]. In the study by Tagoe et al (2011) [ 2 ] the isolated bacteria included Klebsiella pneumoniae (10%), Citrobacter spp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the current study, MRSA was detected in 53% of the samples, followed by CoNS (50%), Bacillus (43%), diphtheroids (30%), MSSA (185%), E. coli and Viridans streptococci (13% each), micrococci (10%), Klebsiella pneumoniae and ESBL Klebsiella pneumoniae (8% each) and finally Acinetobacter baumanii and Candida (3% each). A nearly similar result was reported by Angadi et al (2014) where MRSA was isolated from 53.3% of HCWs mobile phones [ 7 ]. In the study by Tagoe et al (2011) [ 2 ] the isolated bacteria included Klebsiella pneumoniae (10%), Citrobacter spp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Colonized micro-organisms on the devices of HCWs may be transmitted to patients even if patients do not have direct contact with mobile phones [ 6 ]. These organisms if pathogenic can be detrimental to the health of the patients especially those in critical care units and if the organisms transferred happen to be drug-resistant; the situation becomes even more grave as it becomes difficult to treat because of the limited drug options available [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can cause mild to serious infections if it enters the body through cuts, wounds, etc. (Angadi et al, 2014). S. aureus mainly introduced from hands which is the main reservoir for this bacteria and introduced to food while preparation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tambe and Pai [16] recovered 65 S. aureus from 120 mobile phones of health-care providers as the most prevalent bacteria species from the cell phones, and this agrees with the findings of [35] who observed that S. aureus is one of the most frequently isolated bacteria in hospital infections after recovering 39 isolates which was second only to P. aeruginosa with 43 isolates. In another study, [36] also recovered only S. aureus isolates from 30 mobile phones sampled. The antibiotics resistance testing showed high levels of resistance to commonly used antibiotics with the resistance ranging from 17% to gentamicin to 100% resistance observed to cloxacillin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%