2014
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201301231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the retention behavior of iodinated X-ray contrast agents in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography, comparing bare silica and zwitterionic stationary phases

Abstract: Iodinated X-ray contrast media are the most widely used pharmaceuticals for intravascular administration in X-ray diagnostic procedures. The increasing concern of the fate of these compounds into the environment has led to the development of analytical methods to determine them. However, these methods present problems due to the polar character of these analytes. In this paper, hydrophilic interaction LC is presented as an alternative technique. The retention of iodinated X-ray contrast media was studied in tw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three types of monoliths, SMA‐EDMA, PEDAS‐EDMA, and MAA‐EDMA were synthesized and preliminarily investigated. Although successful separation of iohexol on reversed‐phase particle based columns has been reported , no retention of iohexol on the reversed‐phased SMA‐EDMA monolith containing C 18 functional groups was obtained. Similar result was observed from a mixed mode monolith containing both polar –OH and nonpolar –C 17 functional groups; PEDAS‐EDMA monolith.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three types of monoliths, SMA‐EDMA, PEDAS‐EDMA, and MAA‐EDMA were synthesized and preliminarily investigated. Although successful separation of iohexol on reversed‐phase particle based columns has been reported , no retention of iohexol on the reversed‐phased SMA‐EDMA monolith containing C 18 functional groups was obtained. Similar result was observed from a mixed mode monolith containing both polar –OH and nonpolar –C 17 functional groups; PEDAS‐EDMA monolith.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliable and accurate method is needed to control dose amount of iohexol and to determine iohexol clearance for evaluating renal function and diagnosing chronic kidney diseases (CKD) or evaluating risks of developing CKD. For analysis of iohexol in serums, several analytical methods have been developed including HPLC-UV [2,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], LC-MS/MS [3,4,[15][16][17][18][19], LC-ICP-MS [20], CE [1,[21][22][23], inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) [24] and X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF) [25,26]. LC was the most commonly used method for analysis of iohexol [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]; two chromatographic peaks of iohexol stereoisomers could be observed from common RP C 18 columns [2,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%