“…Numerous treatment methods have been deployed, including (a) physical methods, such as physical sorption, ion exchange, and membrane filtration [6][7][8], (b) chemical methods, such as redox treatment, precipitation, and photocatalysis [9], and (c) biological methods, such as aerobic/anaerobic treatment [5,10]. Among 2 of 22 these treatment methods, adsorption is particularly considered one of the most attractive methods due to its high efficiency, simplicity, low cost, low energy consumption, and recyclable nature [6,[11][12][13][14] Through extensive research, various materials [15,16] have been studied as dye-removal adsorbents, including activated carbons [17], biochar [18,19], zeolites, alumina, silica gel, graphene oxide [20], natural materials (wood, coal, chitin/chitosan, clay), industrial/agricultural/domestic wastes, and nanomaterials [21][22][23][24]. Adsorption potential of nanomaterials (spherical ZnO, chitosan and ZnO modification) [24,25] for a wide variety of organic and inorganic contaminants is due to their higher surface area and reactivity.…”