2020
DOI: 10.1002/kin.21404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the reactions of OH with HCl, HBr, and HI between 298 K and 460 K

Abstract: The reactions between OH radicals and hydrogen halides (HCl, HBr, HI) have been studied between 298 and 460 K by using a discharge flow-electron paramagnetic resonance technique. The rate constants were found to be k HCl (298 K) = (7.9 ± 1.3) × 10 −13 cm 3 molecule −1 s −1 with a weak positive temperature dependence, k HBr (298-460 K) = (1.04 ± 0.2) × 10 −11 cm 3 molecule −1 s −1 , and k HI (298 K) = (3.0 ± 0.3) × 10 −11 cm 3 molecule −1 s −1 , respectively. The homogeneous nature of these reactions has been e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure summarizes the results of the present measurements of k 1 in comparison with those from three previous temperature dependence studies realized in overlapping temperature ranges. ,, Concerning the results from this study, one can note an excellent agreement between absolute and relative measurements of the reaction rate constant. In the range of the reported uncertainties on the measurements of k 1 , the current data ( T = 235–960 K) match very well with those from previous study from this group ( T = 230–360 K), as well as the laser flash photolysis-resonance fluorescence measurements of Ravishankara et al ( T = 249–416 K) and recently reported results of discharge flow electron paramagnetic resonance study by Khamaganov et al ( T = 298, 370, and 460 K) . Three most recent room temperature measurements of the reaction rate constant (reporting the values of k 1 between 0.92 and 1.12 × 10 –11 cm 3 molecule –1 s –1 ), in turn, are in good agreement with the results of the temperature-dependent studies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure summarizes the results of the present measurements of k 1 in comparison with those from three previous temperature dependence studies realized in overlapping temperature ranges. ,, Concerning the results from this study, one can note an excellent agreement between absolute and relative measurements of the reaction rate constant. In the range of the reported uncertainties on the measurements of k 1 , the current data ( T = 235–960 K) match very well with those from previous study from this group ( T = 230–360 K), as well as the laser flash photolysis-resonance fluorescence measurements of Ravishankara et al ( T = 249–416 K) and recently reported results of discharge flow electron paramagnetic resonance study by Khamaganov et al ( T = 298, 370, and 460 K) . Three most recent room temperature measurements of the reaction rate constant (reporting the values of k 1 between 0.92 and 1.12 × 10 –11 cm 3 molecule –1 s –1 ), in turn, are in good agreement with the results of the temperature-dependent studies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In the range of the reported uncertainties on the measurements of k 1 , the current data (T=235-960 K) match very well those from previous study from this group (T=230-360 K), 3 as well as the laser flash photolysis-resonance fluorescence measurements of Ravishankara et al (T=249-416 K) 5 and recently reported results of discharge flow-electron paramagnetic resonance study by Khamaganov et al (T = 298, 370 and 460 K). 24 Three most recent room temperature measurements of the reaction rate constant (reporting the values of k 1 between 0.92 and 1.12×10 -11 cm 3 molecule −1 s −1 ), [25][26][27] in turn, are in good agreement with the results of the temperature dependent studies. Solid line in Figure 3 represents the fit to the present data with sum of two exponential functions: k 1 = 2.53×10 -11 exp(-364/T) + 2.79×10 -13 exp(784/T) cm 3 molecule -1 s -1 Considering that, the present results are in excellent agreement with previous temperature dependent measurements of k 1 , this expression can be recommended to use in the temperature range 230 -960 K with conservative independent of temperature uncertainty of 15%.…”
Section: 3supporting
confidence: 72%