Study of the metatarsal formula in patient with primary metatarsalgia

Abstract

ObjectivesThe aims of this study were (i) to ascertain the prevalence of different types of metatarsal formula among patients with primary metatarsalgia; (ii) to compare the variable of “shortening of the first metatarsal in relation to the second” (I/II) between the metatarsalgia and control groups; and (iii) to analyze the intra and interobserver concordance by means of Morton's transverse line method and Hardy and Clapham's arc method.MethodsA cross-sectional observational study was conducted on 56 patients by means of radiographs on their 112 ft, of which 56 were in the metatarsalgia group and 56 in the control group. The evaluations were done between December 2012 and June 2013. The measurements were made by three third-year orthopedics residents with prior training in the methods used, and a template was used.ResultsThere was no concordance between the two methods, as shown by Bland–Altman plots, although the intraclass correlation coefficients showed that the intra and interobserver reproducibility was high using the transverse line method (0.78 and 0.85) and moderate using the arc method (0.73 and 0.60). Comparison between the groups showed that there was a statistical difference (p ≤ 0.05) such that there was greater shortening of the first metatarsal (3.39 mm) in the control group than in the metatarsalgia group (2.14 mm). In the patients with primary metatarsalgia, the index minus metatarsal formula was more prevalent according to the transverse line method (62.5%) and the zero plus type according to the arc method (71.4%).ConclusionIn the present study, it was observed that the metatarsal formula prevalences depended on the measurement method. In both groups, shortening of the first metatarsal predominated. There was no intra or interobserver concordance in either of the two proposed methods.

The dysmorphic metatarsal parabola in diabetes—clinical examination and management: a narrative review

“…42 Many studies have supported the biomechanical effect of either a long or short first metatarsal in the aetiology of forefoot pathology such as functional hallux limitus, hallux rigidus, forefoot plantar pressure, Morton's neuroma, abductory dysfunction resulting in functional pes planus and the potential for calcaneal enthesitis due to torsional forces acting on the plantar fascia or aponeurosis. [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] We are unaware of any other studies documenting the SFM as a risk factor for callus formation and thus diabetic foot ulceration.…”

The differential diagnosis of metatarsalgia

“…Головними причинами виникнення є: надмірна вага тіла, тривале фізичне та статичне навантаження в поєднанні зі структурними анормальностями переднього відділу стопи [2]. Близько 80 % здорових індивідуумів хоча б раз у житті скаржаться на біль у передньому відділі стопи, що розцінюють як М [3].…”

Influence of Foot Type on the Clinical Outcome of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Metatarsalgia. A Prospective Pilot Study

“…An estimated 80% of the general population may experience symptoms of metatarsalgia at some point in their life. Biomechanical alterations are the main aetiological factor, accounting for 92 % of all aetiological factors ( 8 ).…”