2021
DOI: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01654-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the impact of using hybrid nanofluid and saline water preheating on the performance of both integrated solar still and photovoltaic panel using fractional modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 51 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Abd Elbar and Hassan [26] compared the performance of a solar still without preheating and a similar solar still with feed preheating which was done by cooling a photovoltaic panel surface, the results had shown that preheating the solar still feed water by 60% increase the productivity of the solar still, the energy efficiency, the exergy efficiency by 20.9%, 20%, and 60.64%, respectively. Also, mathematical modeling for the solar still preheated by a PV Thermal panel in this research is proposed by El-Gazar et al [27] with an error of 3.59% with the experimental results. Al-Molhem and Eltawil [28] performed a cost analysis for both cases solar still without and with preheating, it was found that preheating the feed water lowered the cost per cubic meter from 0.062 to 0.059 $.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Abd Elbar and Hassan [26] compared the performance of a solar still without preheating and a similar solar still with feed preheating which was done by cooling a photovoltaic panel surface, the results had shown that preheating the solar still feed water by 60% increase the productivity of the solar still, the energy efficiency, the exergy efficiency by 20.9%, 20%, and 60.64%, respectively. Also, mathematical modeling for the solar still preheated by a PV Thermal panel in this research is proposed by El-Gazar et al [27] with an error of 3.59% with the experimental results. Al-Molhem and Eltawil [28] performed a cost analysis for both cases solar still without and with preheating, it was found that preheating the feed water lowered the cost per cubic meter from 0.062 to 0.059 $.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%