2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10965-009-9295-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the crosslink density, dynamo-mechanical behaviour and microstructure of hot and cold SBR vulcanizates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This analysis was originally developed for natural rubber. Nowadays it is also often used for other types of elastomers [ 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis was originally developed for natural rubber. Nowadays it is also often used for other types of elastomers [ 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, this species reacts preferentially with allylic hydrogen atoms of rubber to form initial crosslinks. As the cure proceeds, these crosslinks are broken down to form mono and disulfidic crosslinks 7. The organophilic silicate behaves as an accelerant agent for SBR vulcanization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The C1 and PC1 copolymers displayed similar dynamic behavior and their curves resembled those of loosely cross-linked rubbers and elastomers thanks to the presence of crystalline domains functioning as physical crosslinkers. 60,61 Compared to PC3 copolymer they exhibited higher value of E 0 and their terminal ow region shied towards slightly higher temperatures. Comparable results were reported by Ryynänen et al for multiblock poly(3-caprolactone-co-D,L-lactide-b-3-caprolactone) (P(CL/DLLA-b-CL)) copolymers 62 Similarly to the evaluation of tensile properties, based on the negligible difference of PC1 and PC3 copolymers' molar masses, the difference in dynamic mechanical behavior was directly linked to the inuence of crystalline phase content arising from their copolymer microstructure.…”
Section: Structure Mechanical Properties Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 96%