2020
DOI: 10.36227/techrxiv.11672532
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of Systematic Bias in Measuring Surface Deformation with SAR Interferometry

Abstract: <div>This paper investigates the presence of a new interferometric signal in multilooked Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) interferograms which cannot be attributed to atmospheric or earth surface topography changes. The observed signal is short-lived and decays with temporal baseline; however, it is distinct from the stochastic noise usually attributed to temporal decorrelation. The presence of such fading signal introduces a systematic phase component, particularly in short temporal baseline interferogram… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S7, S8). This confirms the analysis of Andari et al, 2020 [46] showing that short baseline interferograms are the least reliable for deformation retrieval. Biases induced by the integration of short temporal baselines are not only observed in high-moisture regions, but also on the mountain peaks, likely linked to snow and to systematic decorrelations or unwrapping errors induced by the abrupt changes of ground properties.…”
Section: Permafrost's Freeze/thaw Cycles Monitoring With Insarsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…S7, S8). This confirms the analysis of Andari et al, 2020 [46] showing that short baseline interferograms are the least reliable for deformation retrieval. Biases induced by the integration of short temporal baselines are not only observed in high-moisture regions, but also on the mountain peaks, likely linked to snow and to systematic decorrelations or unwrapping errors induced by the abrupt changes of ground properties.…”
Section: Permafrost's Freeze/thaw Cycles Monitoring With Insarsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Finally, we estimate the uncertainty in the velocity from its standard deviation using the percentile bootstrap method (Efron & Tibshirani, 1986) ( Figure S4), and we mask pixels based on several noise indices ( Figure S5). We also test for potential velocity biases associated with short temporal baseline interferograms in a Sentinel-1 network (e.g., Ansari et al, 2020) by removing 6-and 12-day pairs for one LiCSAR frame prior to LiCSBAS velocity inversion ( Figure S11); the standard deviation of the difference between these results is small (~2 mm/year).…”
Section: Interseismic Los Velocity Field Estimation and Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, topographically correlated atmosphere can map in as we do not include a seasonal term in the fitting. Third, a cumulated bias for linear rate estimation in time series may be expected from the use of short period interferograms (Ansari et al., 2021). Finally, discontinuities from phase unwrapping errors or any observation gap can have a significant impact on linear rate evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%