2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssnmr.2009.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of stretched polypropylene fibres by pulsed and CW NMR spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(41 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides higher intensities of the lines of the CH 2 and CH carbons in amorphous regions also Deconvolution of the spectra measured for the miPP and ZN-iPP is also shown in Figure 6 and the relative integral intensities of the individual lines determined by this procedure are summarized for both studied samples in Table 3. In spite of the fact that we have used a two-phase model of polymer with crystalline and amorphous regions only, while three-phase model takes into account also interphase regions of the partially crystalline polymer [7,11,17], the relative integral intensities of the lines related to the main chain CH 2 and CH groups in the crystalline regions of both samples are in accordance with the degree of the crystallinity obtained by DSC (cf. Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides higher intensities of the lines of the CH 2 and CH carbons in amorphous regions also Deconvolution of the spectra measured for the miPP and ZN-iPP is also shown in Figure 6 and the relative integral intensities of the individual lines determined by this procedure are summarized for both studied samples in Table 3. In spite of the fact that we have used a two-phase model of polymer with crystalline and amorphous regions only, while three-phase model takes into account also interphase regions of the partially crystalline polymer [7,11,17], the relative integral intensities of the lines related to the main chain CH 2 and CH groups in the crystalline regions of both samples are in accordance with the degree of the crystallinity obtained by DSC (cf. Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Alternative explanation that the observed differences might be in connection with the dispersion of chemical shifts seems to be for two highlyisotactic polymers rather improbable. The segmental motion in amorphous regions of iPP is related to the glass transition relaxation (#-relaxation) that was recently studied by wide-line 1 H NMR [17]. To confirm a difference discussed above we also measured 1 H NMR spectra under MAS with the spinning rate of 6 kHz at 71°C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%