Study of solid particle erosion on AISI D2 using angular silicon carbide and steel round grit particles

Vite-Torres, M.; Laguna-Camacho, J.R.; Baldenebro-Castillo, R.E.; Gallardo-Hernández, Ezequiel Alberto; Lasorsa, Carlos; Villagrán-Villegas, Luz Yazmín

doi:10.1179/1751584x13y.0000000057

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The materials employed in the erosion tests were Metal Babbitt Grade 7 (Tin, antimony, lead Alloy) and AISI T1 steel in similar testing conditions as AISI D2 steel employed in a previous research work [9]. An EDS analysis was performed to obtain the chemical compositions of the two materials.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Erosion of metals using angular silicon carbide particles

Laguna-Camacho

Sánchez-Yáñez

Calderón-Ramón

et al. 2019

Tribology - Materials, Surfaces & Interfaces

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this work, erosion tests conducted to evaluate the resistance of two materials, Metal Babbitt Grade 7 and AISI T1 against SiC particles. The erosion rates of these two metals compared with those obtained using AISI D2 steel in a previous work with similar testing conditions. Metal Babbitt and AISI T1 steel selected due to their high ductility and strength, respectively. A test rig similar to that shown in ASTM G76-95 standard used to perform the tests. Silicon carbide particles had a particle size between 350-450 µm. Tests carried out using different impact angles, 30°, 45°, 60°and 90°with a particle velocity of 24 ± 2 m/s and the abrasive flow rate was 0.7 ± 0.5 g/min. SEM photographs used to identify the wear mechanisms on the Babbitt and T1 steel and also obtained cross-section images of the wear scars on metal Babbitt to measure their depth.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The erosion rig used to perform the erosion tests was presented in a research work [9]. This equipment was similar to that presented in ASTM G76 [10], although the nozzle had larger dimensions: 4.7 mm internal diameter, 6.3 mm external diameter and a length of 260 mm.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%