2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of Site's Construction Waste in Batu Pahat, Johor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A case study in Malaysia reported that a total of 175,000 tons and more than 100,000 tons of CDW were generated annually in Kuching and Samarahan, respectively [6]. The dumping of CDW is on or nearby a municipal solid waste landfill [7] has become one of the most common waste disposal practices due to the lack of proper management by the responsible agencies. Low pH (< pH 6) of leachate released from young municipal solid waste landfill [8] in Malaysia has possibly changed the properties of CDW due to the leaching behavior of chemical elements from such waste.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A case study in Malaysia reported that a total of 175,000 tons and more than 100,000 tons of CDW were generated annually in Kuching and Samarahan, respectively [6]. The dumping of CDW is on or nearby a municipal solid waste landfill [7] has become one of the most common waste disposal practices due to the lack of proper management by the responsible agencies. Low pH (< pH 6) of leachate released from young municipal solid waste landfill [8] in Malaysia has possibly changed the properties of CDW due to the leaching behavior of chemical elements from such waste.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of being a waste patron, construction waste has additionally been outcome into ecological issues in Malaysia [3]. Issues of unlawful dumping have swelled quickly everywhere throughout the nation [16]. There are a lots of construction waste created in the nation because of rapid development in construction industry.…”
Section: Construction Waste Issues In Malaysiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When looking at them at the country level, it is observed that different countries around the world have been investigated in this regard. Among them, there are (i) European countries such as Netherlands (Bossink & Brouwers, 1996), Greece (Banias, Achillas, Vlachokostas, Moussiopoulos & Papaioannou, 2011), Norway (Bergsdal, Bohne & Brattebo, 2007), Ireland (Kelly & Hanahoe, 2008) (Coelho & de Brito, 2011a,b;De Melo, Goncalves & Martins, 2011;Malia, de Brito, Pinheiro & Bravo, 2013), and Germany (Hoglmeier, Weber-Blaschke & Richter, 2013), (ii) Asian countries such as Hong Kong (Tam, 2008;Jaillon, Poon & Chiang, 2009;Cheng & Ma, 2013;Li & Zhang, 2013), Taiwan (Hsiao, Huang, Yu & Wernick, 2002), Malaysia (Begum, Siwar, Pereira & Jaafar, 2006;Lau, Whyte & Law, 2008;Che Hasan, Yusof, Mohd Ridzuan, Atan, Noordin & Abdul Ghani, 2013;Nagapan, Rahman, Asmi & Adnan, 2013), China (Li, Ding, Mi & Wang, 2013), Japan (Hashimoto, Tanikawa & Moriguchi, 2009), and Thailand (Kofoworola & Gheewala, 2009), (iii) American countries such as the US (Cochran & Townsend, 2010), Canada (Wimalasena, Ruwanpura & Hettiaratchi, 2010), and Brazil (Formoso, Soibelman, De Cesare & Isatto, 2002), (iv) Middle Eastern countries such as Kuwait (Kartam, Al-Mutairi, Al-Ghusain & Al-Humoud, 2004), Palestine (Al-Sari, Al-Khatib, Avraamides & Fatta-Kassinos, 2012), Israel (Katz & Baum, 2011), and Lebanon (Tamraz, Srour & Chehab, 2011), and lastly (v) Australia (McDonald & Smithers, 1998).…”
Section: Fresh Rmc Wastementioning
confidence: 99%