2019
DOI: 10.1007/s42107-018-00114-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of seismic response characteristics of building frame models using shake table test and considering soil–structure interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, all required material properties of the physical model were scaled using similitude law suggested by Iai et al [27]. Structures are usually scaled down to a smaller size [28,29]. Considering the dimensions of the laminate shear model box, a geometric scale of λ 30 was used.…”
Section: Scaling Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, all required material properties of the physical model were scaled using similitude law suggested by Iai et al [27]. Structures are usually scaled down to a smaller size [28,29]. Considering the dimensions of the laminate shear model box, a geometric scale of λ 30 was used.…”
Section: Scaling Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study four, six and eight storeys moment resistant steel frame models of 1.2, 1.8 and 2.4m heights were fabricated [18]. These fabricated models represented 12, 18 and 24 m heights of actual residential buildings.…”
Section: Test Frame Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, effect of SSI becomes important for structures situated on relatively soft soils. Many researchers [2][3][4] confirm that Kobe, 1995 earthquake highlighted the seismic behaviour of a superstructure as well as substructure.The transmitting boundaries can be typically classified into two important arrangements [5]; local (viscous) and consistent boundaries. Local boundary conditions are commonly used in engineering practice because the radiation condition is satisfied approximately at the artificial boundary, as the solution is local in space and time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%