2008
DOI: 10.1109/tdei.2008.4483469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of Partial Discharge Localization Using Ultrasonics in Power Transformer Based on Particle Swarm Optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In (10), w k t+1 is the new adaptive weight, t is the iteration count, w t k is the k th particle weight, ∆w t k is the change in weight value. In (11), v k t+1 is the new velocity vector, v k t is the k th particle velocity, t is the iteration count, w k t+1 is the adaptive inertia weight, c 1 and c 2 are learning parameters, rand 1 and rand 2 are random numbers, p best and g best are local best solution and global best solution, x k t is the current particle solution. In (12), x k t+1 is the new position vector and other terms are the same as in (11).…”
Section: Fuzzy Adaptive Pso Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In (10), w k t+1 is the new adaptive weight, t is the iteration count, w t k is the k th particle weight, ∆w t k is the change in weight value. In (11), v k t+1 is the new velocity vector, v k t is the k th particle velocity, t is the iteration count, w k t+1 is the adaptive inertia weight, c 1 and c 2 are learning parameters, rand 1 and rand 2 are random numbers, p best and g best are local best solution and global best solution, x k t is the current particle solution. In (12), x k t+1 is the new position vector and other terms are the same as in (11).…”
Section: Fuzzy Adaptive Pso Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Veloso et al [9], [10] compared the least square (LS) method and genetic algorithm for localization of PD source and it is located accurately with large population size and iterations by genetic method whereas iterative LS method located with inaccurate manner. Tang et al [11] compared iterative LS method and PSO method for localization of PD source, when compared to LS method, PSO method gives better location results. Kundu et al [12] illustrated a non-iterative method for localization of PD source and its demerit is, it also yields two different solutions similar to GPS algorithm and in that only one solution is true.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many applications in which efficiently (accurately and promptly) solving the localization problem is crucial, such as navigation [21], underwater networks [22], surveillance [23,24], or power systems [25,26]. When considering the fourth industrial transformation and the fundamental advanced digital changes-known as Industry 4.0robust and precise localization can be seen as a key feature in pervasive systems in future industry and factory applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In its early stages, the PSO algorithm [9,10] was also used for solving some acoustic localization problems, namely, those related to the localization of partial discharge sources in power transformers [31,32]. Both non-linear and binary forms of the optimization algorithm were successfully applied [25,33]. The PSO algorithm contributed to the beginning of a new approach to the nonlinear optimization problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%