2019
DOI: 10.3390/ijgi8120552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of NSSDA Variability by Means of Automatic Positional Accuracy Assessment Methods

Abstract: Point-based standard methodologies (PBSM) suggest using ‘at least 20’ check points in order to assess the positional accuracy of a certain spatial dataset. However, the reason for decreasing the number of checkpoints to 20 is not elaborated upon in the original documents provided by the mapping agencies which develop these methodologies. By means of theoretical analysis and experimental tests, several authors and studies have demonstrated that this limited number of points is clearly insufficient. Using the po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PAAT is a point-based standard methodology (PBSM) which uses a series of measures to characterise the positional difference between two sets of geospatial data. It computes the random and systematic errors between a reference dataset and a target dataset, expressing differences through three metrics: mean residual, root mean square error (RMSE), and standard deviation [72][73][74]. Likewise, the degree of uncertainty is calculated using two metrics: absolute circular error (ACE) and relative circular error (RCE) at a 90% confidence level.…”
Section: Positional Accuracy Cum Vector-based Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PAAT is a point-based standard methodology (PBSM) which uses a series of measures to characterise the positional difference between two sets of geospatial data. It computes the random and systematic errors between a reference dataset and a target dataset, expressing differences through three metrics: mean residual, root mean square error (RMSE), and standard deviation [72][73][74]. Likewise, the degree of uncertainty is calculated using two metrics: absolute circular error (ACE) and relative circular error (RCE) at a 90% confidence level.…”
Section: Positional Accuracy Cum Vector-based Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Federal Geographic Data Committee recently proposed the National Standard for Spatial Data Accuracy (NSSDA), which is applicable to both analog and digital cartographic data [41]. This standard assumes a normal distribution of ε and uses the root mean square error (RMSE) as the most common and valid statistical measure for the evaluation of products obtained via photogrammetry and remote sensing.…”
Section: Determination Of the Errors Obtainedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The National Standard for Spatial Data Accuracy (NSSDA) is a recent standard proposed by the Federal Geographic Data Committee (1998) [32] and can be used for both analog and digital cartographic data [33]. This standard assumes a normal distribution of ε and uses the root-mean-square error (RMSE) as the most common and valid statistic for the evaluation of products obtained by photogrammetry and remote sensing.…”
Section: Calculation Of the Errormentioning
confidence: 99%