Study of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math>production and light hadronic states in the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">¯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mm

Matvienko, D.; Kuzmin, A.; Eidelman, S.; Abdesselam, A.; Adachi, I.; Aihara, H.; Said, S. Al; Arinstein, K.; Asner, D. M.; Aulchenko, V.; Aushev, T.; Ayad, R.; Babu, V.; Badhrees, I.; Bahinipati, S.; Bakich, A. M.; Bansal, V.; Bhardwaj, V.; Bhuyan, B.; Biswal, Jyoti Prakash; Bobrov, A.; Bondar, A.; Bonvicini, G.; Bożek, A.; Bračko, M.; Browder, T. E.; Červenkov, D.; Chen, A.; Cheon, B. G.; Chilikin, K.; Chistov, R.; Cho, K.; Chobanova, V.; Choi, S. K.; Choi, Y.; Cinabro, D.; Dalseno, J.; Dingfelder, J.; Doležal, Z.; Drásal, Z.; Drutskoy, A.; Dutta, D.; Epifanov, D.; Farhat, H.; Fast, J. E.; Ferber, T.; Fulsom, B. G.; Gaur, V.; Gabyshev, N.; Garmash, A.; Getzkow, D.; Gillard, R.; Goh, Y. M.; Goldenzweig, P.; Golob, B.; Hara, T.; Hayasaka, K.; Hayashii, H.; He, X.; Hou, W.-S.; Iijima, T.; Inguglia, G.; Ishikawa, A.; Itoh, R.; Iwasaki, M.; Jaeglé, I.; Joffe, D.; Joo, K. K.; Julius, T.; Kawasaki, T.; Kim, D. Y.; Kim, J. B.; Kim, J. H.; Kim, K. T.; Kim, M. J.; Kim, S. H.; Kim, Y. J.; Ko, B. R.; Kodyš, P.; Korpar, S.; Krokovny, P.; Kumar, Rajeev; Lange, J. S.; Lee, D. H.; Gioi, L. Li; Libby, J.; Liventsev, D.; Miyabayashi, K.; Miyata, H.; Mizuk, R.; Mohanty, G. B.; Moll, A.; Mussa, R.; Nakano, E.; Nakao, M.; Nanut, T.; Nayak, M.; Nisar, N. K.; Nishida, S.; Ogawa, S.; Pakhlova, G.; Pal, B.; Park, C. W.; Park, H.; Pedlar, T. K.; Pesántez, L.; Pestotnik, R.; Petrič, M.; Piilonen, L. E.; Pulvermacher, C.; Ribežl, E.; Ritter, M.; Rostomyan, A.; Sakai, Y.; Sandilya, S.; Šantelj, L.; Sanuki, T.; Schneider, O.; Schnell, G.; Schwanda, C.; Senyo, K.; Seon, O.; Sevior, M. E.; Shapkin, M.; Shebalin, V.; Shen, C. P.; Shibata, T. A.; Shiu, J. G.; Shwartz, B.; Sibidanov, A.; Simon, F.; Sohn, Y. S.; Sokolov, A.; Starič, M.; Steder, M.; Sumihama, M.; Sumisawa, K.; Tamponi, U.; Tanida, K.; Teramoto, Y.; Uchida, M.; Uehara, S.; Unno, Y.; Uno, S.; Urquijo, P.; Usov, Y.; Hulse, C. Van; Vanhoefer, P.; Varner, G.; Vinokurova, A.; Vorobyev, V.; Wagner, M. N.; Wang, C. H.; Wang, M. Z.; Wang, P.; Watanabe, Y.; Williams, K. M.; Won, E.; Yamamoto, H.; Yashchenko, S.; Yook, Y.; Zhang, Z. P.; Zhilich, V.; Zhulanov, V.; Zupanc, A.

doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.012013

Cited by 14 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 71 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Two values for the longitudinal polarization fraction are tried, one from the color-suppressed mode B 0 →D Ã0 ω, f L ¼ ð66.5 AE 4.7 AE 1.5Þ% [58] (this result is consistent with the result presented in Ref. [59]) and the other from the color-allowed mode B 0 → D Ã− ρ þ , f L ¼ ð88.5 AE 1.6 AE 1.2Þ% [60]. A systematic uncertainty of 1.6% for the B 0 →D Ã0 ½D 0 γπ þ π − modeling, corresponding to the largest deviation from the nominal result, is assigned.…”

Section: Signal and Background Modelingsupporting

confidence: 86%

Observation of the decay Bs0→D¯0
Aaij¹,
Adeva²,
Adinolfi³
et al. 2018
Phys. Rev. D
Self Cite
13
0
4
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The first observation of the B 0 s →D 0 K þ K − decay is reported, together with the most precise branching fraction measurement of the mode B 0 →D 0 K þ K −. The results are obtained from an analysis of pp collision data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 3.0 fb −1. The data were collected with the LHCb detector at center-of-mass energies of 7 and 8 TeV. The branching fraction of the B 0 →D 0 K þ K − decay is measured relative to that of the decay B 0 →D 0 π þ π − to be BðB 0 →D 0 K þ K − Þ BðB 0 →D 0 π þ π − Þ ¼ ð6.9 AE 0.4 AE 0.3Þ%, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic. The measured branching fraction of the B 0 s →D 0 K þ K − decay mode relative to that of the corresponding B 0 decay is BðB 0 s →D 0 K þ K − Þ BðB 0 →D 0 K þ K − Þ ¼ ð93.0 AE 8.9 AE 6.9Þ%. Using the known branching fraction of B 0 →D 0 π þ π − , the values of BðB 0 →D 0 K þ K − Þ ¼ ð6.1AE0.4AE0.3AE0.3Þ×10 −5 and BðB 0 s →D 0 K þ K − Þ ¼ ð5.7AE0.5AE0.4AE0.5Þ×10 −5 are obtained, where the third uncertainties arise from the branching fraction of the decay modes B 0 →D 0 π þ π − and B 0 →D 0 K þ K − , respectively.

show abstract

Section: Signal and Background Modelingsupporting

confidence: 86%

Observation of the decay Bs0→D¯0
Aaij¹,
Adeva²,
Adinolfi³
et al. 2018
Phys. Rev. D
Self Cite
13
0
4
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The ratio of branching fractions BðB 0 s →D Ã0 ϕÞ=BðB 0 →D 0 π þ π − Þ is measured to be ð4.2 AE 0.5 AE 0.4Þ% and the branching fraction BðB 0 s →D Ã0 ϕÞ is ð3.7AE0.5AE0.3AE0.2Þ×10 −5 . The fraction of longitudinal polarization is measured to be f L ¼ ð73 AE 15 AE 4Þ%, which is comparable with measurements from similar color-suppressed B 0 decays [19,20]. The ratio of branching fractions BðB 0 s →D Ã0 ϕÞ= BðB 0 s →D 0 ϕÞ is 1.23 AE 0.20 AE 0.08.…”

supporting

confidence: 76%

“…The B 0 s →D Ã0 ϕ decay is a vector-vector mode and can proceed through different polarization amplitudes. A measurement of its fraction of longitudinal polarization (f L ) is of particular interest because a significant deviation from unity would confirm previous results from similar color-suppressed B 0 decays [19,20], as expected from theory [21,22]. This also helps to constrain QCD models and to search for effects of physics beyond the Standard Model (see review of polarization in B decays in Ref.…”

mentioning

confidence: 53%

Observation of Bs0→D¯*0<

Aaij¹,

Adeva²,

Adinolfi³

et al. 2018

Phys. Rev. D

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The obtained calibration factors are summarized in Table I. Additionally, we correct the branching fractions of the decays [46,62].…”

Section: A Signal Pdf Shapementioning

confidence: 99%

Measurement of the τ lepton polarization and R(D) in the decay
Hirose¹,
Iijima²,
Adachi³
et al. 2018
Phys. Rev. D*
Self Cite
203
6
181
1
View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Study ofD**production and light hadronic states in theB¯0

Cited by 14 publications

References 71 publications

Observation of the decay Bs0→D¯0
Aaij¹,
Adeva²,
Adinolfi³
et al. 2018
Phys. Rev. D
Self Cite
13
0
4
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Observation of the decay Bs0→D¯0
Aaij¹,
Adeva²,
Adinolfi³
et al. 2018
Phys. Rev. D
Self Cite
13
0
4
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Observation of Bs0→D¯*0<

Measurement of the τ lepton polarization and R(D) in the decay
Hirose¹,
Iijima²,
Adachi³
et al. 2018
Phys. Rev. D*
Self Cite
203
6
181
1
View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Study ofD**production and light hadronic states in theB¯0

Cited by 14 publications

References 71 publications

Observation of the decay Bs0→D¯0Aaij1, Adeva2, Adinolfi3 et al. 2018Phys. Rev. DSelf Cite13040View full textAdd to dashboardCite

Observation of the decay Bs0→D¯0Aaij1, Adeva2, Adinolfi3 et al. 2018Phys. Rev. DSelf Cite13040View full textAdd to dashboardCite

Observation of Bs0→D¯*0<

Measurement of the τ lepton polarization and R(D*) in the decay Hirose1, Iijima2, Adachi3 et al. 2018Phys. Rev. DSelf Cite20361811View full textAdd to dashboardCite

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Observation of the decay Bs0→D¯0
Aaij¹,
Adeva²,
Adinolfi³
et al. 2018
Phys. Rev. D
Self Cite
13
0
4
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Observation of the decay Bs0→D¯0
Aaij¹,
Adeva²,
Adinolfi³
et al. 2018
Phys. Rev. D
Self Cite
13
0
4
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Measurement of the τ lepton polarization and R(D) in the decay
Hirose¹,
Iijima²,
Adachi³
et al. 2018
Phys. Rev. D*
Self Cite
203
6
181
1
View full text Add to dashboard Cite