Study of micro-porosity in electron beam butt welding

Abstract

As complete elimination of porosity from the weld is very difficult, the next option available is to minimize this weld porosity, which is crucial for the safe performance of the welded components. However, this investigation through experiments alone is very tedious and time consuming. Additionally, very limited models are available in the literature for accurate prediction of different porosity attributes. The present study, thus, addressees both the experimental as well as modelling aspect on the study of micro-porosity during Electron Beam Welding (EBW) of SS304 plates. Welding parameters are reported to have significant influence on the micro-porosity. Hence, the influences of these parameters on micro-porosity attributes, namely pores number, average diameter, and sphericity are extensively studied experimentally employing optical microscopy (OM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray computed tomography (XCT), and Raman spectroscopy. This is followed by an elaborate modelling through seven popular and wellrecognized Machine Learning Algorithms (MLAs) namely, Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Support Vector Regression (SVR), M5P model trees regression, Reduced Error Pruning Tree (REPTree), Random Forest (RF), Instance-based k-nearest neighbor algorithm (IBk) and Locally Weighted Learning (LWL). These different techniques enhance the chance of obtaining the better predictions of the said micro-porosity attributes by overcoming the effect of data-dependence and other limitations of individual MLAs. The different model-predicted micro-porosity data are also validated through experimental data. Statistical tests and Monte-Carlo reliability analysis are additionally utilized to evaluate the performances of the employed algorithms. IBk and MLP are overall found to perform well.

Joining Technologies for Aluminium Castings—A Review

“…Surface cleaning is important not only for a low joint porosity but also a good fit-up. During electron beam welding, large melt area with the slower cooling rate is observed to increase the chance of gases' escape from weld zone [125]. The large weld pool was generated by a high beam energy density and a slow welding speed.…”