36th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit 2006
DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-3541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of Large Eddy Simulation and Smagorinsky Model Using Explicit Filtering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, because no explicit (discrete) filter operator is applied in most PRNS approaches (including the approach advocated in this paper), it is difficult to quantify the commutation errors in the simulation. Even so, there is no definitive evidence that the performance of simulations based on explicit filtering is necessarily better than those based on implicit filtering [3].…”
Section: Prnsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, because no explicit (discrete) filter operator is applied in most PRNS approaches (including the approach advocated in this paper), it is difficult to quantify the commutation errors in the simulation. Even so, there is no definitive evidence that the performance of simulations based on explicit filtering is necessarily better than those based on implicit filtering [3].…”
Section: Prnsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As a consequence, a grid independent LES is achieved. The advantages and disadvantages of both techniques have been exclusively studied [4][5][6][7][8][9] and is beyond the scope of this article. To date implicit filtering has generally been adopted by commercial CFD softwares for industrial problems thanks to its flexibility and simplicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 and 3, respectively. According to the wall unites describedy by Brandt (2006), the size of the grid cell in wall units is x z + + Δ = Δ =60. Therefore, the grid density is suit for the application of Smagorinsky LES model in fluid field.…”
Section: Numerical Simplification and Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%