Study of ionospheric disturbances over the China mid- and low-latitude region with GPS observations

Abstract

Abstract. Ionospheric disturbances constitute the main restriction factor for precise positioning techniques based on global positioning system (GPS) measurements. Simultaneously, GPS observations are widely used to determine ionospheric disturbances with total electron content (TEC). In this paper, we present an analysis of ionospheric disturbances over China mid-and low-latitude area before and during the magnetic storm on 17 March 2015. The work analyses the variation of magnetic indices, the amplitude of ionospheric irregularities observed with four arrays of GPS stations and the influence of geomagnetic storm on GPS positioning. The results show that significant ionospheric TEC disturbances occurred between 10:30 and 12:00 UT during the main phase of the large storm, and the static position reliability for this period are little affected by these disturbances. It is observed that the positive and negative disturbances propagate southward along the meridian from mid-latitude to low-latitude regions. The propagation velocity is from about 200 to 700 m s −1 and the amplitude of ionospheric disturbances is from about 0.2 to 0.9 TECU min −1 . Moreover, the position dilution of precession (PDOP) with static precise point positioning (PPP) on storm and quiet days is 1.8 and 0.9 cm, respectively. This study is based on the analysis of ionospheric variability with differential rate of vertical TEC (DROVT) and impact of ionospheric storm on positioning with technique of GPS PPP.

Assessing the Positioning Performance Under the Effects of Strong Ionospheric Anomalies With Multi‐GNSS in Hong Kong

“…They mainly focus on two folds, that is, the ionospheric response and its effects on GNSS positioning service. They characterized the ionospheric irregularities of different regions, such as China (Ning & Tang, 2018; Sun et al, 2017), Norway (Jacobsen & Andalsvik, 2016), India (Yadav et al, 2016), high‐latitude region (Cherniak et al, 2015), low‐latitude region (Maurya et al, 2018), South America (Barbosa et al, 2018), African equatorial/low‐latitude region (Amaechi et al, 2018), European‐African region (Borries et al, 2016), and the global scale. At the same time, they also used different instruments or data, including ground‐based GNSS data, ionosondes data, TSX data, GRACE data, Swarm data, GUVI, Jason‐2, and GPS data on Jason‐2 for understanding the geomagnetic storm (Astafyeva et al, 2015; Chen et al, 2016; Jin et al, 2017; Kuai et al, 2016; Nava et al, 2016; Prikryl et al, 2016).…”

A comparative study of ELF and VLF noise characteristics of nor’wester at a low latitude tropical station

“…Because of this complexity, the radio signature of a lightning strike is detected by alternative means. Reception of ELF/VLF wave permits to find almost the exact location of majority discharges using a few numbers of ELF/VLF receivers scattered around [12]. Characteristics of average spectra reported due to electromagnetic radiation fields from some particular atmospheric lightning events.…”

GNSS-based analysis of high latitude ionospheric response on a sequence of geomagnetic storms performed with ROTI and a new relative STEC indicator

“…Their application predominantly involves multi-purpose satellite positioning and a broad spectrum of atmospheric studies (Hernández-Pajares et al, 2011;Branzanti et al, 2013;Paziewski, 2015;Wilgan et al, 2015;Banville et al, 2017). Regarding the conditions prevailing in the ionosphere, dual-frequency satellite observations are nowadays commonly applied to total electron content (TEC) mapping (Komjathy et al, 2005;Jakowski et al, 2011;Li et al, 2015;Ren et al, 2016) and monitoring of different-origin ionospheric disturbances (Wautelet & Warnant, 2014;Park et al, 2013;Ryu et al, 2014;Sieradzki, 2015;Tsagouri & Belehaki, 2015;Ning & Tang, 2018).…”