2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.109100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of instability of the Fourier split-step method for the massive Gross–Neveu model

Abstract: Stability properties of the well-known Fourier split-step method used to simulate a soliton and similar solutions of the nonlinear Dirac equations, known as the Gross-Neveu model, are studied numerically and analytically. Three distinct types of numerical instability that can occur in this case, are revealed and explained. While one of these types can be viewed as being related to the numerical instability occurring in simulations of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, the other two types have not been studied… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(193 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerical schemes for (61) have attracted considerable attention in the last few years; see, for example, [40,41] and references therein. We will simulate two of its exact soutions.…”
Section: Numerical Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerical schemes for (61) have attracted considerable attention in the last few years; see, for example, [40,41] and references therein. We will simulate two of its exact soutions.…”
Section: Numerical Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we will not test their performance relative to those of the MoC‐(N)pRK schemes due to, again, space limitation, as well as in order to maintain our focus on the latter schemes. It should be noted that the fourth‐order method proposed in [40] is (unlike the MoC‐(p)RK4) restricted to using periodic BC; it was demonstrated in [41] that certain solutions (62) exhibit numerical instability for periodic (but not for nonreflecting) BC.…”
Section: Numerical Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%