2010
DOI: 10.1007/s13193-011-0046-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of Incidence of Lymphedema in Indian Patients Undergoing Axillary Dissection for Breast Cancer

Abstract: Lymphedema of the upper extremity, in addition to being unsightly, can be painful, can limit the arm movements, increases the risk of infection and is psychologically distressing, serving as a constant reminder of cancer. 1. To ascertain the incidence of lymphedema in a hospital based population (in patients undergoing axillary dissection for breast cancer. 2. To determine the clinicoepidemilogical factors associated with the occurrence of lymphedema in these patients. For all patients undergoing axillary diss… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…10 Lymphedema, following breast cancer treatment, occurs due to lymphatic interruption following surgical trauma or radiotherapy induced fibrosis that leads to chronic inflammation and consequent fibrosis of the hypodermal and dermal connective tissue. 11 In the present study, the overall cumulative incidence of lymphedema has increased from 4% at 3 months to 7% at 6 months to 14% at 12 months to 18% at 24 months postoperatively which is quite different to a study by Warren et al 12 in which only 6.8% of patients developed lymphedema at 24 months and 13.7% at 60 months postoperatively.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…10 Lymphedema, following breast cancer treatment, occurs due to lymphatic interruption following surgical trauma or radiotherapy induced fibrosis that leads to chronic inflammation and consequent fibrosis of the hypodermal and dermal connective tissue. 11 In the present study, the overall cumulative incidence of lymphedema has increased from 4% at 3 months to 7% at 6 months to 14% at 12 months to 18% at 24 months postoperatively which is quite different to a study by Warren et al 12 in which only 6.8% of patients developed lymphedema at 24 months and 13.7% at 60 months postoperatively.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…Pillai et al found axillary radiation and the number of positive axillary lymph nodes to be the only two factors responsible for development of lymphoedema, in a prospective study from India. 7 Our study also analysed a few common factors which have been implicated in the causation of lymphoedema after axillary dissection. However, our premise based on our own experience is that significant lymphoedema of the arm is quite uncommon after axillary surgery although minor increase in the circumference of the arm or forearm is not uncommon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in tune with the incidence reported by other Indian cancer institutes. 7,8 In world literature, the incidence of lymphoedema reported varies widely. This is because there is no standard definition of lymphoedema and no universally accepted method of measurement of arm lymphoedema.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies classify axillary dissection and radiotherapy as risk factors for lymphoedema. [13,14] Clark and Sitzia [1] reported that axillary dissection and radiotherapy have no effect on lymphoedema formation; however, they found that 80% of their patients who developed lymphoedema within 3 years had developed it within the first year. Purushotham et al [2] found no association between adjuvant treatment and lymphoedema in patients who had undergone the same treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%