2014
DOI: 10.9790/2380-071133437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of Genetic Variability, Heritability and Genetic Advance in Foxtail Millet in both Rainy and Post Rainy Season

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It might be due to the fact that gen0types are different in their yielding potential depending on many physiological processes taking place in different plant parts, and are controlled by both the genetic makeup of the plant and the environment. These results are in agreement with the findings of Brunda et al (2014), Srikanya et al (2020) and Jyothi et al (2016) in foxtail millet. Among the foliar application treatments, there was an improvement in grain and straw yield to an extent of 29.05 % in grain and 16.28 % respectively over control (Table 3 and Figure 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…It might be due to the fact that gen0types are different in their yielding potential depending on many physiological processes taking place in different plant parts, and are controlled by both the genetic makeup of the plant and the environment. These results are in agreement with the findings of Brunda et al (2014), Srikanya et al (2020) and Jyothi et al (2016) in foxtail millet. Among the foliar application treatments, there was an improvement in grain and straw yield to an extent of 29.05 % in grain and 16.28 % respectively over control (Table 3 and Figure 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…(Table4). These results are in agreement withBrunda et al (2014) for grain yield per plant,Nirubana et al (2017) for the number of productive tillers per plant andSao et al (2017) for the length of panicle.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The occurrence of the disease at Naivasha enhanced high heritability (0.86) as compared with the low heritability (0.18) at Mlangarini. This is due to the fact that uniform environmental conditions ensure high level of heritability while variable environments lower the level of heritability (Brunda et al, 2014). The amount of inoculum applied on the plants at Naivasha was actually uniform such that genetic variation of the accessions in this study exerted an influence responsible for the variation in response against MLND.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%