2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2011.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of force distribution in the citrus tree canopy during harvest using a continuous canopy shaker

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Harvesting trial using canopy shaker had indicated the fruit removal efficiency ranges between 80 and 90%. Analysis of the force and acceleration during the harvest in the tree canopy might give some insightful information for understanding and resolving the raised concerns [24]. Figure 1(a) shows a picture of citrus grove captured in Lake Alfred, Florida, USA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harvesting trial using canopy shaker had indicated the fruit removal efficiency ranges between 80 and 90%. Analysis of the force and acceleration during the harvest in the tree canopy might give some insightful information for understanding and resolving the raised concerns [24]. Figure 1(a) shows a picture of citrus grove captured in Lake Alfred, Florida, USA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Same letter in the same column shows no significant difference between configuration with a high value of operating parameter (A1 F0 D0 S0, A0 F1 D0 S0, A0 F0 D1 S0, A0 F0 D0 S1) and the reference configuration (Duncan's test, p<0.05). Canopy shaker vibration parameters for traditional olive trees tion at the bonding point of the fruit with the stem or the stem with the branch (Savary et al, 2011). Furthermore, the probability of direct contact between the rods and the fruit during the shaking and free-fall process could be the cause of the increase in damage to the detached fruit , which has a particularly negative effect in terms of table olives quality (Jimenez-Jimenez et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fruit removal efficiency is affected by modifications to tree structure (Savary et al, 2011), the location of the fruit in the canopy (Ferguson et al, 2010), the characteristics of the fruit itself (Farinelli et al, 2012) or even the physical properties of the wood of the tree resulting from its growth or management (El-Awady et al, 2008). The highest results of removal efficiency with the configuration studied have been relatively low comparing with available commercial canopy shakers (Whitney, 1999), so it is necessary to adjust every parameter to create a good configuration to achieve better results.…”
Section: Harvestermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acquired x, y and z-axis coordinates of the semi-accelerometers would be shown as a visible text file using the LabVIEW 2016 software architectures [12]. In addition, if more calculations are required, the acceleration forces could be calculated from the known semi-accelerometers sense (3-axial of acceleration values as shown in the existed text-file) and some standard equations of the resultant acceleration and Newton's Second Law of Motion [3,6]. Thus, diagrams of the semi-accelerometer analogue signal could be developed in the reconfigurable students' lab and then utilized for the oscillations in practical applications, such as live …”
Section: Accelerometers' Simulation Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For vibration force measurements on citrus tree canopy, Udumala Savary et al [6] developed a sensing application to reveal the data associated with the tree canopy vibration that was required to detach citrus fruits. Depending on the accelerometer capabilities, the accelerometers' raw data (acceleration and the coordinates of x, y and z-axes) were compiled into a text file by using MathScript through the LabVIEW palettes, and the text file was then utilized to calculate the canopy shaker frequencies and vibration forces.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%