Volume 1A: Codes and Standards 2015
DOI: 10.1115/pvp2015-45844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of Fatigue Initiation of Austenitic Stainless Steel in a High Temperature Water Environment and in Air Using Blunt Notch Compact Tension Specimens

Abstract: Fatigue life assessment procedures for components exposed to high temperature pressurised water environments are typically based on NUREG/CR-6909 or broadly similar codes (e.g. proposed ASME code case N-792). The effects of a high temperature water environment on the fatigue life are accounted for by simply adjusting the fatigue life in ambient temperature air by an environmental factor (FEN). This adjustment assumes that the environment affects both initiation (nucleation) and propagation equally, which is po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these empirical approaches allow engineers to quickly assess the component's design lives, they are not directly based on time-dependent damage evolution and damage accumulation, which can lead to the fatigue failure of metallic components. Furthermore, there remains considerable debate on how to incorporate the effect of the reactor environment while evaluating the fatigue life of reactor components by empirical approaches [8]. Also, as many different codes and standards use different approaches (e.g., based on stress [3][4][5] or strain range methods [6,7]), it is sometimes difficult to decide which method to use.…”
Section: Theoretical Background On Evolutionary Cyclic Plasticity: Apmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these empirical approaches allow engineers to quickly assess the component's design lives, they are not directly based on time-dependent damage evolution and damage accumulation, which can lead to the fatigue failure of metallic components. Furthermore, there remains considerable debate on how to incorporate the effect of the reactor environment while evaluating the fatigue life of reactor components by empirical approaches [8]. Also, as many different codes and standards use different approaches (e.g., based on stress [3][4][5] or strain range methods [6,7]), it is sometimes difficult to decide which method to use.…”
Section: Theoretical Background On Evolutionary Cyclic Plasticity: Apmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, several improvements to fatigue design (S $ N) curves have been recommended by various researchers. Some of the improvements are considering the effects of environments [6,7], surface finish [8], mean stress [9], and hold time [10]. To assess fatigue damage under variable/random amplitude loading using the fatigue design (S $ N) curves, currently, the linear damage accumulation rule [11] along with rainflow cycle counting method [12] is used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One method of accomplishing this has been factoring out the effect of the reactor coolant on the fatigue life estimations based on S~N curves [2][3][4]. Recent work by various researchers [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] has further demonstrated the value of the experimental and S~N based approach to fatigue life estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%