Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) Lithography IV 2013
DOI: 10.1117/12.2011709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of EUV outgassing spatial distribution toward witness plate in the EUV outgas tester

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EB-based evaluation tool, EUVOM-9000 (Litho Tech Japan Co.), is located at Tsukuba Japan. The EUV-based tool is set up at the beamline 9 of NewSUBARU which is the synchrotron radiation facility of the University of Hyogo [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. The resist thicknesses were 60 nm.…”
Section: Resist Outgas Evaluation Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EB-based evaluation tool, EUVOM-9000 (Litho Tech Japan Co.), is located at Tsukuba Japan. The EUV-based tool is set up at the beamline 9 of NewSUBARU which is the synchrotron radiation facility of the University of Hyogo [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. The resist thicknesses were 60 nm.…”
Section: Resist Outgas Evaluation Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EUV type tester named HERC was developed for basic outgassing research and not for the resist qualification inorder to avoid the exposure in the scanner. Previous studies reported fundamental research results of the resist outgassing from the CAR by using the model resists available to-date [9,10]. Resist outgas test sites including the EIDEC continued the evaluation of many commercially available EUV resists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous study, we compared the cleanable contamination of several model resists that showed a linear correlation between EUV-and EB-based evaluation systems [2]. Moreover, we studied noncleanable contamination on the unexposed area and clarified its dependency on the geometry of the WS in the vacuum chamber [3][4][5][6]. Moreover the comparison of the cleanable and noncleanable contamination in the resist family, which consisted of the same components with various protecting ratios and PAG loading, showed a good correlation [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%