2014
DOI: 10.9790/0853-13240919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of ER, PR & HER-2/NEU reactivity pattern in the patient of Breast Cancer in northern part of india

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 Jain et al, reported infiltrating duct carcinoma in 91.9% patient. 10 In present study max. Longitudinal diameter (L) on axillary ultrasound was found to be 36mm and a mean diameter of 11.17mm whereas the max.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…9 Jain et al, reported infiltrating duct carcinoma in 91.9% patient. 10 In present study max. Longitudinal diameter (L) on axillary ultrasound was found to be 36mm and a mean diameter of 11.17mm whereas the max.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…Breast cancer is best characterized by combined expression of these receptors than by single receptor status alone. Studies have shown that tumors over expressing HER2/neu are usually ER and PR negative and present at younger age with aggressive tumor biology [21]. Patients who are ER/PR positive and HER2/neu negative are more likely to be older, have early stage disease and have decreased incidence of lymphnode involvement [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Bhagat et al and Jain et al reported PR positivity in 37.93% and 34% cases respectively. 24,25 In our study maximum number of cases were of combined ER and PR negative tumors constituting 58% cases, followed by ER and PR positive tumors constituting 32%, followed by ER positive and PR negative tumors (10%). Desai et al in their study also observed that tumors with combined ER and PR negativity were most common and were present in 46.5% cases, followed by both ER and PR positivity in 25% cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%