“…The transition from elastic deformation of SLC to elastoplastic proceeds at the exceedance of critical value of stress on indenter. In this case, the indentation would exceed the critical penetra tion a cr , corresponding to this critical load N cr [4]. Let us split all peaks that are in contact by two groups 1 depending on the degree of their penetration ( Fig.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2), the total real contact area can be represented as the sum of the areas, which are formed by the peaks of the first and second groups, respectively, at the interaction with SLCs as follows: (4) where and are real contact areas of the peaks of the first and second groups, respectively. …”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equation for the relative penetration of a spherical indenter to the elastoplastic coating fixed with the elastic base can be represented as follows [4]: (7) where d = h/a cr is relative penetration of spherical indenter to elastoplastic coating; h is penetration of spherical indenter; k = P/N cr is relative load on spher ical indenter; and α is the coefficient, which is deter mined by the ratio of real contact area to its section area at the penetration depth.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtain the following from the Eq. (6), with the assumption that ρ = [4]; equilibrate the load on indenter at elastic deformation of coating P to the load on a single peak for the first group and replace the indentation h by the penetration of the single peak as follows: (8) We should note that the transition of load on indenter P to the load on a single peak for the first group N 1i and replacement of indentation h by the penetration of a single peak implies the extension of the solution obtained for indenter to any peak of the considered rough surface if it is modeled by spherical segment and is in an elastic contact interaction with coating.…”
Section: Calculation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter [3] considers the discrete contact as the contact problem of elasticity or elastoplasticity problem with the assumption of the mutual effect of individual contacts on strain-stress state of interacting surfaces. The use of the former approach allows the extension of the early studies of the characteristics of elastoplastic contact of spherical indenter with SLCs [4] on the contact interaction of rough surfaces, one of which has an elastoplastically strained coating. The essential characteristics of the contact of rough surfaces are the approach of solids under stress and the real contact area.…”
A calculation model for estimating the contact interaction characteristics of rough surfaces, one of which has a solid lubricating coating is considered. The obtained relations are verified experimentally and are compared with the data of the other authors. The influence of the physicomechanical properties of the coating, as well as its thickness, parameters of microgeometry, and applied loads on contact deformation and real contact area of interaction surfaces is shown.
“…The transition from elastic deformation of SLC to elastoplastic proceeds at the exceedance of critical value of stress on indenter. In this case, the indentation would exceed the critical penetra tion a cr , corresponding to this critical load N cr [4]. Let us split all peaks that are in contact by two groups 1 depending on the degree of their penetration ( Fig.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2), the total real contact area can be represented as the sum of the areas, which are formed by the peaks of the first and second groups, respectively, at the interaction with SLCs as follows: (4) where and are real contact areas of the peaks of the first and second groups, respectively. …”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equation for the relative penetration of a spherical indenter to the elastoplastic coating fixed with the elastic base can be represented as follows [4]: (7) where d = h/a cr is relative penetration of spherical indenter to elastoplastic coating; h is penetration of spherical indenter; k = P/N cr is relative load on spher ical indenter; and α is the coefficient, which is deter mined by the ratio of real contact area to its section area at the penetration depth.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtain the following from the Eq. (6), with the assumption that ρ = [4]; equilibrate the load on indenter at elastic deformation of coating P to the load on a single peak for the first group and replace the indentation h by the penetration of the single peak as follows: (8) We should note that the transition of load on indenter P to the load on a single peak for the first group N 1i and replacement of indentation h by the penetration of a single peak implies the extension of the solution obtained for indenter to any peak of the considered rough surface if it is modeled by spherical segment and is in an elastic contact interaction with coating.…”
Section: Calculation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter [3] considers the discrete contact as the contact problem of elasticity or elastoplasticity problem with the assumption of the mutual effect of individual contacts on strain-stress state of interacting surfaces. The use of the former approach allows the extension of the early studies of the characteristics of elastoplastic contact of spherical indenter with SLCs [4] on the contact interaction of rough surfaces, one of which has an elastoplastically strained coating. The essential characteristics of the contact of rough surfaces are the approach of solids under stress and the real contact area.…”
A calculation model for estimating the contact interaction characteristics of rough surfaces, one of which has a solid lubricating coating is considered. The obtained relations are verified experimentally and are compared with the data of the other authors. The influence of the physicomechanical properties of the coating, as well as its thickness, parameters of microgeometry, and applied loads on contact deformation and real contact area of interaction surfaces is shown.
The paper indicates that the application of roughness models and the theories of contacting rough surfaces developed by Greenwood-Williamson and N. B. Demkin for solving the problems of hermetology leads to significant errors. This is explained by much greater contact pressures than assumed for the tribology problems, describing only the initial part of the reference surface curve and the lack of allowance for the plastic extrusion of the material. A brief review of methods for describing the introduction of a sphere into an elastoplastic reinforced half-space is given. The properties of the elastoplastic reinforced material are described by the power law of Hollomon. To describe the indentation and flattening of single spherical asperity, the results of finite element modeling are used. The cases of contacting a rigid rough surface with an elastoplastic half-space and a rigid smooth surface with a rough surface are considered. To determine the relative contact area, the discrete roughness model is used in the form of a set of spherical segments distributed along the height in accordance with the curve of the reference surface.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.