2001
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of differences in peripheral muscle strength of lean versus obese women: an allometric approach

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether peripheral muscle strength is signi®cantly different between lean and obese women controlled for age and physical activity, using an allometric approach. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of isometric handgrip and isokinetic leg and trunk muscle strength. SUBJECTS: 173 obese (age 39.9 AE 11.4 y, body mass index (BMI) 37.8 AE 5.3 kgam 2 ) and 80 lean (age 39.7 AE 12.2 y, BMI 22.0 AE 2.2 kgam 2 ) women. MEASUREMENTS: Anthropometric measures (weight, height) and body composition (bio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

16
177
3
17

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(213 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
16
177
3
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Forbes et al (1983) reported that most obese individuals, children as well as adults, have increased lean weight and that DIO results in both fat mass and lean mass augmentation (Forbes and Welle 1983). This and other results showing stable lean mass during the development of obesity (Hulens et al 2001) suggest that carrying greater weight may have physical traininglike effects (Hulens et al 2001). There is confusion on how to interpret changes in lean mass associated with muscle separately from non-muscle fat-free mass, that is, liver, intestine, kidney, and heart, which indeed might be enlarged with the development of obesity (Masgrau et al 2012).…”
Section: Lean Mass Decreasementioning
confidence: 65%
“…Forbes et al (1983) reported that most obese individuals, children as well as adults, have increased lean weight and that DIO results in both fat mass and lean mass augmentation (Forbes and Welle 1983). This and other results showing stable lean mass during the development of obesity (Hulens et al 2001) suggest that carrying greater weight may have physical traininglike effects (Hulens et al 2001). There is confusion on how to interpret changes in lean mass associated with muscle separately from non-muscle fat-free mass, that is, liver, intestine, kidney, and heart, which indeed might be enlarged with the development of obesity (Masgrau et al 2012).…”
Section: Lean Mass Decreasementioning
confidence: 65%
“…As stated, aging affects strength of the knee extensors [6,10]. We believe the slower stair climbing score is a result of declining strength: stair ascent requires concentric muscle action against gravity repeatedly, while the descent requires eccentric control of the quadriceps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Patients with TKA were stable on tests of functional performance and self-report outcome measures during this investigation; however, lower scores on functional tests compared to controls indicate their level of function was not as good as individuals without osteoarthrosis. Aging affects strength of the knee extensors [6,10] and played a role in declining strength [9] in these individuals who were tested over the course of several years. The decline in strength in the nonoperated limb was clearly steeper than that of the control subjects suggesting more than aging was at play.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are inconsistent, but many studies suggest that obese individuals have increased absolute muscle strength, at least in some of the measured muscles. 20,21 Adjustment to muscle mass may change the association between obesity and muscle strength to neutral 21 or negative. 20 The results are also dependent on the studied muscle groups and their actions, for example, leg vs arm, dynamic vs isometric, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,21 Adjustment to muscle mass may change the association between obesity and muscle strength to neutral 21 or negative. 20 The results are also dependent on the studied muscle groups and their actions, for example, leg vs arm, dynamic vs isometric, etc. 21 A paucity of information exists regarding the effects of strength training on abdominal obesity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%