2016
DOI: 10.1017/s0263034616000082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of crossed-beam energy transfer process with large crossing angle in three-dimension

Abstract: In this paper, a three-dimensional (3D) model as a new module of LAP3D code is presented to study the crossed-beam energy transfer (CBET) process. This model is not limited by the paraxial approximation and can be used to deal with a large crossing angle case. Besides, this model is also appropriate for the multi-ion species conditions and even multibeams problems, which will be very helpful in relevant experiment analysis and the target design. In our 3D simulations, we take the overlapped beams with a 60°cro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A better control of the laser propagation has been achieved experimentally by the use of Spectral Dispersion (SSD) and Random Phase Plates (RPP) optical smoothing techniques [7][8][9][10] and have been considered efficient to mitigate filamentation instability [11][12][13][14], beam bending [15][16][17][18] and forward Brillouin. To date, only stimulated backward Raman or Brillouin instabilities [19,20], cross beam energy transfer [21], two plasmon decay [22,23] or collective scattering [24,25], are identified as critical issues in ICF, and remain active area of research. However, the small mitigation of cross beam energy transfer [26] and backward Brillouin scattering by laser smoothing techniques may presage similar tendencies concerning the forward scattering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A better control of the laser propagation has been achieved experimentally by the use of Spectral Dispersion (SSD) and Random Phase Plates (RPP) optical smoothing techniques [7][8][9][10] and have been considered efficient to mitigate filamentation instability [11][12][13][14], beam bending [15][16][17][18] and forward Brillouin. To date, only stimulated backward Raman or Brillouin instabilities [19,20], cross beam energy transfer [21], two plasmon decay [22,23] or collective scattering [24,25], are identified as critical issues in ICF, and remain active area of research. However, the small mitigation of cross beam energy transfer [26] and backward Brillouin scattering by laser smoothing techniques may presage similar tendencies concerning the forward scattering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to complex multibeam laserplasma instabilities. One important example is crossed-beam energy transfer (CBET) between two beams [4][5][6][7][8], which can redistribute laser energy, alter drive symmetry, and modify hydrodynamic conditions. Apart from CBET, the collective light can be reamplified and enhanced significantly due to the contributions of the collective instabilities [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to complex multibeam laserplasma instabilities. One important example is crossed-beam energy transfer (CBET) between two beams [3][4][5][6][7], which can redistribute laser energy, alter drive symmetry, and modify hydrodynamic conditions. Apart from CBET, the collective stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS) and the collective stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) of multiple beams with shared daughter waves can also be important, since the temporal growth rate and convective gain are expected to depend on the combined laser intensities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%