2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of columnar growth, texture development and wettability of reactively sputter-deposited TiN, ZrN and HfN thin films at glancing angle incidence

Abstract: In this work, TiN, ZrN and HfN thin films fabricated using glancing angle deposition (GLAD) technique are studied both experimentally and by numerical simulations. The films (1 µm thickness) were deposited by reactive magnetron sputtering at 0.3 Pa and 300°C on Si substrates inclined at α=85° with respect to the target. The film morphology and crystal structure were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy and Xray diffraction (XRD), including pole figure measurements. The wettab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference in the morphology of the produced TiN and ZrN nanostructures, i . e ., quite smooth NWs vs arrays of granular NWs, respectively, may be assigned to a variety of reasons, such as differences in the angular and energy distributions of sputtered atoms reaching the substrate at a glancing angle and the reduced mobility of Zr adatoms on the active growing surface. , The reported morphological features do not change after the deposition of the homogeneous 5 nm ultrathin SiN x capping layer over the TiN or ZrN nanostructures (Figure a, step 4). When the GLAD of TiN or ZrN and the sputter deposition of the homogeneous SiN x capping layer are repeated three times, in order to produce triple arrays of nanostructures and increase their linear as well as nonlinear plasmonic response, the surface morphology of the top array of nanostructures is less organized and coherent as it is shown in the Supporting Information (Figure S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference in the morphology of the produced TiN and ZrN nanostructures, i . e ., quite smooth NWs vs arrays of granular NWs, respectively, may be assigned to a variety of reasons, such as differences in the angular and energy distributions of sputtered atoms reaching the substrate at a glancing angle and the reduced mobility of Zr adatoms on the active growing surface. , The reported morphological features do not change after the deposition of the homogeneous 5 nm ultrathin SiN x capping layer over the TiN or ZrN nanostructures (Figure a, step 4). When the GLAD of TiN or ZrN and the sputter deposition of the homogeneous SiN x capping layer are repeated three times, in order to produce triple arrays of nanostructures and increase their linear as well as nonlinear plasmonic response, the surface morphology of the top array of nanostructures is less organized and coherent as it is shown in the Supporting Information (Figure S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in the morphology of the produced TiN and ZrN nanostructures, i.e. quite smooth NWs vs arrays of granular NWs, respectively, may be assigned to a variety of reasons, such as differences in angular and energy distribution of sputtered atoms reaching the substrate at glancing angle, and the reduced mobility of Zr adatoms on the active growing surface [57,58]. The reported morphological features do not change after the deposition of the homogeneous 5 nm ultrathin SiNx capping layer over the TiN or ZrN nanostructures (Fig.…”
Section: A Fabrication Concept and Morphology Of Nanostructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the years, various properties of Zr-nitride coatings have been investigated for a range of applications. It has been evaluated for its microhardness, adhesion and wear resistance in tribological applications and as a barrier material in integrated circuits [1] , [2] , [3] , [4] , [5] , [6] , [7] , [8] , [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] , erosion protection for turbine and compressor blades [23] , [24] , [25] , biocompatibility [26] , optical and electrical properties [27] , [28] , nuclear fuel element compatibility [29] , [30] , [31] , and orientation dependence, microstructure, composition and corrosion [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] , [37] , [38] , [39] , [40] . Influence of synthesis parameters on coating properties have also been investigated [41] , [42] , [43] , [44] , [45] , [46] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The greatest effect of improving the properties when using this approach was the creation of ceramic-like coatings on the surface. Such coatings with high properties are based on nitrides [9,10], borides [11,12] and oxides [13,14] of transition metals, both in the form of single-layer [15,16] and multilayer [17,18] composites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%