2018
DOI: 10.3390/ma12010099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of Agave Fiber-Reinforced Biocomposite Films

Abstract: Thermoplastic resins (linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), and polypropylene (PP)) reinforced by different content ratios of raw agave fibers were prepared and characterized in terms of their mechanical, thermal, and chemical properties as well as their morphology. The morphological properties of agave fibers and films were characterized by scanning electron microscopy and the variations in chemical interactions between the filler and matrix materials were studied using Fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were seen for the extruded ones; however, SD particles were still evident in the sheets (Figure 7b). Similar images were presented by Annandarajah et al for agave fiber (5,10,20, and 30 wt.%) reinforced polypropylene, linear low density, and high density polyethylene composite films prepared via extrusion [43]. It is also worth mentioning that some samples suffered dewetting and melt flow marks.…”
Section: Properties Of Pcl/sd Composite Sheetssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Similar results were seen for the extruded ones; however, SD particles were still evident in the sheets (Figure 7b). Similar images were presented by Annandarajah et al for agave fiber (5,10,20, and 30 wt.%) reinforced polypropylene, linear low density, and high density polyethylene composite films prepared via extrusion [43]. It is also worth mentioning that some samples suffered dewetting and melt flow marks.…”
Section: Properties Of Pcl/sd Composite Sheetssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This trend is directly related to observations related to the poor interfacial adhesion (Figures 3‐5) where some voids and poor contact at the fiber‐matrix interface can be seen. [ 52,53 ] Therefore, the stress is not well distributed in the composite as reported by Siregar et al [ 13 ] On the other hand, the tensile strength was improved by applying a fiber surface treatment (especially for T and TM). The presence of MAPE on the fiber interface improves the stress transfer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The thickness of each layer was found to increase with both AF (more void and defects) and ACA (because foam) content, leading to a 55% density reduction (0.93 g/cm 3 ) compared with that of the neat matrix (0.44 g/cm 3 ). The poor interfacial adhesion between fiber and matrix is due to their incompatibility and the voids that reduce the mechanical properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The matrix used was linear medium density polyethylene (LMDPE) RO 93650 from Polímeros Nacionales (Tlaquepaque, Mexico) with a density of 0.936 g/cm 3 and a melt flow index of 5 g/10 min (2.16 kg/190 • C). Agave fibers (AF) (Agave tequilana Weber var.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation