2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.08.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of a small heat and power PEM fuel cell system generator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using an SR, with the highest conversion efficiency, may yield a saving of up to 30% in fuel compared to other methods [111]. SR is a highly endothermic reaction (À206 kJ mol À1 CH 4 ) and it is generally carried out at 700e800 C. Thermal energy required for endothermic SR reactions can be generated in the fuel processor by the integrated combustion burner that uses the same gas as the reformer.…”
Section: Fuel Processormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using an SR, with the highest conversion efficiency, may yield a saving of up to 30% in fuel compared to other methods [111]. SR is a highly endothermic reaction (À206 kJ mol À1 CH 4 ) and it is generally carried out at 700e800 C. Thermal energy required for endothermic SR reactions can be generated in the fuel processor by the integrated combustion burner that uses the same gas as the reformer.…”
Section: Fuel Processormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combined Heat and Power (CHP) systems based on integrated solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC) are considered to be attractive future energy systems [1][2][3][4][5][6]. SOFC systems generate electricity with high thermal efficiency and low emissions and can also generate high quality heat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SOFC systems generate electricity with high thermal efficiency and low emissions and can also generate high quality heat. Very high overall efficiencies (>80%) can be achieved in natural gas and biogas fueled combined heat and power applications [1]. One major challenge for achieving such efficiencies is presented by the non-coincident and dynamic thermal and electrical demand profiles of many applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steam reforming is generally the preferred method as it produces higher concentrations of hydrogen, and thus requires up to 30% less hydrocarbon fuel (Hubert et al, 2006). the hydrogen rich steam leaving the reformer will contain a proportion of CO and sulphurous compounds (usually converted to H 2 s in the reforming stage) from the fuel source and added odorants.…”
Section: Fuel Processormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10.4 (Hubert et al, 2006). The main benefit of steam reforming is the high concentration of hydrogen in the output reformate -70-80%, compared with 50-60% for autothermal and even less for partial oxidation; which consequently gives the highest operating efficiency (Woods and Cuzens, 2001).…”
Section: © Woodhead Publishing Limited 2011mentioning
confidence: 99%