2022
DOI: 10.1039/d1cp04915a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study and quantification of the enantiodiscrimination power of four polymeric chiral LLCs using NAD 2D-NMR

Abstract: Identifying and understanding the role of key molecular factors involved in the orientation/discrimination phenomena of analytes in polymer-based chiral liquid crystals (CLCs) are essential tasks for optimizing computational predictions (molecular...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[10d-f,12c-e,13b,15] These media are chiral LLC phases derived from various polymers such as poly-γbenzyl-L/D-glutamate (PBLG/PBDG), [10d,11,16] poly-γ-ethyl-L/ (PPAs). [12,20] Except for PBLG, most of the alignment media induce sufficiently weak alignment to deliver simple extraction of RDCs. The RDCs of several analytes were measured in these media demonstrating their enantiodiscrimination capabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10d-f,12c-e,13b,15] These media are chiral LLC phases derived from various polymers such as poly-γbenzyl-L/D-glutamate (PBLG/PBDG), [10d,11,16] poly-γ-ethyl-L/ (PPAs). [12,20] Except for PBLG, most of the alignment media induce sufficiently weak alignment to deliver simple extraction of RDCs. The RDCs of several analytes were measured in these media demonstrating their enantiodiscrimination capabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These NMR interactions have been successfully exploited in structural/conformational studies, in the determination of 3D structures, relative configurations [7–10] or in the measurement of enantiomeric excesses, … [1,2] However, the underlying principles governing the enantio‐discrimination mechanisms, i. e. the difference between SαβR ${{\langle {S}_{{\rm \alpha }{\rm \beta }}\rangle }^{R}}$ and SαβS ${{\langle {S}_{{\rm \alpha }{\rm \beta }}\rangle }^{S}}$ , are still under investigation [11–13] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have assessed and compared the enantio‐discrimination either for a given chiral solute in regards to various polymeric‐based CLCs, or rather for a collection of analytes dissolved in similar mesophases. This can be evaluated by measuring the local differential ordering effect (DOE) using selectively deuterated analytes [24] or at a more global level by comparing SαβR,S ${{\langle {S}_{{\rm \alpha }{\rm \beta }}\rangle }^{R,S}}$ for both enantiomers (variation of principal axis direction, 9D angle, …) determined using anisotropic data such as ( 1 H‐ 1 H)‐RDC, ( 13 C‐ 1 H)‐RDC and more recently 2 H‐RQC [1,2,6,11] . While more comprehensive and reliable, this approach is sometimes time‐consuming and requires a sufficient amount of anisotropic data to determine the Saupe's matrices, SαβR,S ${{\langle {S}_{{\rm \alpha }{\rm \beta }}\rangle }^{R,S}}$ , (over 5 for C 1 ‐symmetry chiral molecules) [25]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations