2013
DOI: 10.5539/elt.v6n5p62
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study Abroad and Interlanguage Pragmatic Development in Request and Apology Speech Acts among Iranian Learners

Abstract: This research study empirically investigated the impact of study abroad context on L2 learners' pragmatic development compared with study at home group in Iran. For the study abroad group the participants were selected from the Iranian students who registered in a six-month program in language institutes in India (Mysore) and for the study at home group the participants were chosen from the language learners at the most outstanding language institute in Iran (Iran Language Institute) at the intermediate level.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, no effects were reported for learners' genders, and all three studies that targeted this variable did not report its correlation with L2 pragmatic development (Liao 2009;Rasouli Khorshidi 2013;Shively and Cohen 2008). Unlike gender, the positive effects of individuals' language background, for instance, the effect of their first language or any additional acquired languages, were found positive in all three studies that explored it (e.g., Liu 2017;Pozzi et al 2021).…”
Section: Learner Variablesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…On the other hand, no effects were reported for learners' genders, and all three studies that targeted this variable did not report its correlation with L2 pragmatic development (Liao 2009;Rasouli Khorshidi 2013;Shively and Cohen 2008). Unlike gender, the positive effects of individuals' language background, for instance, the effect of their first language or any additional acquired languages, were found positive in all three studies that explored it (e.g., Liu 2017;Pozzi et al 2021).…”
Section: Learner Variablesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Research in the field of sociolinguistic competence during SA tends to focus on pragmatics—the study of those aspects of language that cannot be considered in isolation from its use, language in its situational context, including the knowledge and beliefs of the speaker and the relationship and interaction between speaker and listener. It is generally known SA has a significant impact on the acquisition of sociolinguistic competence (Rasouli Khorshidi 2013; Ren 2013; Félix-Brasdefer & Hasler-Barker 2015). Within SA, research has been generally carried out in interlanguage pragmatics (ILP) with intercultural pragmatics and cross-cultural pragmatics receiving less focus.…”
Section: Linguistic Constructs and Gains: Documenting Learning Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) Many scholars have researched the positive effects of SA on cultural competence and intercultural awareness (Engle and Engle, 2004;Medina-Lopez-Portillo, 2004;Berg, 2009;Jackson, 2009;Beaven & Spencer-Oatey, 2016), including sociolinguistic competence (Khorshidi, 2013;Ren, 2013;Felix-Brasderfer & Hasler-Barker, 2014), pragmatic competence (Shardakova, 2005;Diao, 2011), and sociocultural competence (Regan et al, 2009).…”
Section: Overview Of Research On the Study Abroad Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%