1982
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/201.3.807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on the spectra of K-giants - I. Physical parameters and Fe and Ti abundances for 26 K-giants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
2

Year Published

1985
1985
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
11
2
Order By: Relevance
“…c This is star [BHM2000] 139 of Bonifacio et al (2000). (1) This paper, (2) Lambert & Ries (1981), (3) Gratton et al (1982), (4) Komarov & Shcherbak (1980), (5) Komarov et al (1985), (6) Gratton & Ortolani (1986), (7) (2002) is quite similar to ours except for the 3 truly metal-poor stars, out of their sample of 14; analogs to these are totally lacking in our sample. It is relevant to point out that Monaco et al (2002), exactly Quite correctly Cole, pointed out that this estimate could in fact be too low, since the relations are calibrated on GGCs and age effects may bias downwards the results by 0.1−0.2 dex; furthermore the lack of α-enhancement in Sgr (confirmed by the present analysis), at variance with GCCs, would also act in the direction to lower the photometric metallicity estimate.…”
Section: Metallicity Distributionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…c This is star [BHM2000] 139 of Bonifacio et al (2000). (1) This paper, (2) Lambert & Ries (1981), (3) Gratton et al (1982), (4) Komarov & Shcherbak (1980), (5) Komarov et al (1985), (6) Gratton & Ortolani (1986), (7) (2002) is quite similar to ours except for the 3 truly metal-poor stars, out of their sample of 14; analogs to these are totally lacking in our sample. It is relevant to point out that Monaco et al (2002), exactly Quite correctly Cole, pointed out that this estimate could in fact be too low, since the relations are calibrated on GGCs and age effects may bias downwards the results by 0.1−0.2 dex; furthermore the lack of α-enhancement in Sgr (confirmed by the present analysis), at variance with GCCs, would also act in the direction to lower the photometric metallicity estimate.…”
Section: Metallicity Distributionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…One of the possible reasons may be that the infrared regions used in this work are not overly occupied by lines. The effective temperatures obtained are in good agreement with that indicated by Gratton et al (1982). Conversely, gravities are close to that derived by McWilliam (1990) and Lambert & Ries (1981 Drake & Smith (1991) showed for β Gem, that metallicities are not significantly affected by departures from NLTE.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Only Gratton et al (1982) and Gratton (1983) have tabulated a value of log g = 2.1, a result which was obtained from a curve of growth technique. Also the gravity value given by Burnashev (1983) -who has used narrow-band photometric colours in the visible part of the electromagnetic spectrum -is quite discrepant from the more common listed value of log g = 2.9.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Published Stellarmentioning
confidence: 99%