1951
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1951.tb00748.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on the Regulation of Respiration in Acute Hypoxia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
91
2
1

Year Published

1965
1965
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
91
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hypoxia is known to increase the responsiveness of the peripheral chemoreceptor to CO 2 (20,42), and to reduce the PCO 2 and the H ϩ concentration ([H ϩ ]) at the central chemoreceptors (CC) through its effect of increasing cerebral blood flow (40). In contrast, hyperoxia suppresses peripheral chemoresponsiveness to CO 2 (23) and increases PCO 2 and [H ϩ ] at the sites of central chemoreceptors through reduction of cerebral blood flow (17,21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hypoxia is known to increase the responsiveness of the peripheral chemoreceptor to CO 2 (20,42), and to reduce the PCO 2 and the H ϩ concentration ([H ϩ ]) at the central chemoreceptors (CC) through its effect of increasing cerebral blood flow (40). In contrast, hyperoxia suppresses peripheral chemoresponsiveness to CO 2 (23) and increases PCO 2 and [H ϩ ] at the sites of central chemoreceptors through reduction of cerebral blood flow (17,21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mammals, interactive effects of O 2 and CO 2 are detectible at the level of ventilation (Nielsen and Smith, 1952), at the level of carotid sinus nerve discharge (Tenney and Brooks, 1966;Daristotle et al, 1987;Lahiri and Delaney, 1975a) and to a very small extent at the level of the increase in intracellular [Ca 2+ ], within the glomus cells, associated with chemoreceptor activation (Bamford et al, 1999;Roy et al, 2000). High levels of CO 2 increase the sensitivity of the carotid body chemoreceptors to low O 2 ; conversely, low levels of O 2 increase the sensitivity of the ventilatory response to hypercapnia (Bamford et al, 1999).…”
Section: Potential Mechanisms Underlying Interactive Effects Between mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second and most likely, one might regard the ventilation of the animal as an indication ofthe drive level (motivation) existing in neural circuits involved in respiratory control and, if one assumes that this drive level govern:; both the somatic respiratory movements and the learned somatic motor act, then, any factors which tend to activate respiration (via these neural circuits) would also tend to activate the learned motor response. Although the stimulation of the peripheral chemoreceptors by mild hypoxia produces only a small immediate increase in ventilation it !ioes produce a considerable increase in the ventilatory response to C02 (Nielsen, 1952) and thus might be expected to decrease the latent 'period for learned escape (just as would an increast: in CO 2 concentration) .…”
Section: Stephen Arnold Weinstein2mentioning
confidence: 99%