1928
DOI: 10.1128/jb.16.1.57-63.1928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on the Proteolytic Bacteria of Milk I. A Medium for the Direct Isolation of Caseolytic Milk Bacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1932
1932
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second medium contained (in grams per litre): meat extract 3.0; peptone 5.0; NaCl 5.0; skimmed milk 2.5; Ca (0H)2 0.15; CaCl2 0.05; agar 15; pH 7.0. (Frazier andRupp 1928, Brandt 1939). For the total number of heterotrophs the mean of the number of bacteria found on the two media was calculated.…”
Section: Aerobic Bacterial Countsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second medium contained (in grams per litre): meat extract 3.0; peptone 5.0; NaCl 5.0; skimmed milk 2.5; Ca (0H)2 0.15; CaCl2 0.05; agar 15; pH 7.0. (Frazier andRupp 1928, Brandt 1939). For the total number of heterotrophs the mean of the number of bacteria found on the two media was calculated.…”
Section: Aerobic Bacterial Countsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The American Public Health Association (1967) rccommends the addition of loo/, (v/v) of sterile skimmilk to Standard Methods Agar, yct it has long been known that acid-forming bacteria can produce zones of clearing on such media. Two surveys (Frazier & Rupp, 1928;Lightbody, 1961) showed that 3745% of the zones of clearing on milk agar were not due to proteolysis. The most serious disadvantage, therefore, associated with the milk agar method is the need to flood the medium with a protein precipitant to codinn that zoncs of clearing are due to proteolysis and not caused by acid formed by the organisms as a result of sugar fermentation.…”
Section: An Improved Agar Medium For the Detection Of Proteolyticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most serious disadvantage, therefore, associated with the milk agar method is the need to flood the medium with a protein precipitant to codinn that zoncs of clearing are due to proteolysis and not caused by acid formed by the organisms as a result of sugar fermentation. In an attempt to overcome some of these difficulties, Frazier & Rupp (1928) dcvised an opaque carbohydrate-free casein agar medium to eliminate clearing duc to acid production. The limitation of this medium for organisms not requiring carbohydrate has prevented its general adoption.…”
Section: An Improved Agar Medium For the Detection Of Proteolyticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacteria were screened for the synthesis of extracellular proteases and lipases at temperatures of 4, 10, and 18 • C. Synthesis of proteases was assessed based on the original method by Frazier and Rupp (1928) by placing a volume of 10 µl of a pre-grown culture onto a calcium caseinate agar plate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, United States) and monitoring the formation of a clear halo around the colony during incubation for up to 4 weeks. As for lipases, bacterial strains were first screened for a general lipolytic activity by placing a volume of 10 µl of a pre-grown culture onto a R2A agar plate supplemented with sunflower oil (1% v/w) and rhodamine B (0.001% v/w) and monitoring under UV irradiation the formation of a fluorescent orange-pink halo around the colony (Beisson et al, 2000).…”
Section: On Plate Screening For Cold-active Enzymesmentioning
confidence: 99%