1931
DOI: 10.1021/j150320a022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on the Porous Disc Method of measuring and L. H. Osmotic Pressure

Abstract: as part of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1948
1948
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the rest of this paper, the subject-matter will be restricted to the field of porousdisk osmometry. The classical work of Frazer & Patrick (1927) was extended by subsequent investigators in the U.S.A. (Eichelberger 1931;Martin & Schulz 1931;Townend 1928) and Germany (Wohl 1937;Hess& Suranyi 1939;Ulmann 1931Ulmann ,1933, but the essential features were preserved. In all cases the measured osmotic pressures were sufficiently large to justify the use of a column of mercury in the reference arm for the measurement of the hydrostatic drag, whereas figure 1 in this paper shows an all-solvent system th at is more suitable for low osmotic pressures.…”
Section: E Xperimental Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the rest of this paper, the subject-matter will be restricted to the field of porousdisk osmometry. The classical work of Frazer & Patrick (1927) was extended by subsequent investigators in the U.S.A. (Eichelberger 1931;Martin & Schulz 1931;Townend 1928) and Germany (Wohl 1937;Hess& Suranyi 1939;Ulmann 1931Ulmann ,1933, but the essential features were preserved. In all cases the measured osmotic pressures were sufficiently large to justify the use of a column of mercury in the reference arm for the measurement of the hydrostatic drag, whereas figure 1 in this paper shows an all-solvent system th at is more suitable for low osmotic pressures.…”
Section: E Xperimental Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 98%