2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.09.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on the optimum conditions using acid-washed zero-valent iron/aluminum mixtures in permeable reactive barriers for the removal of different heavy metal ions from wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
42
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(77 reference statements)
3
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon is described by different redox potential of copper (Cu +2 /Cu, 0.34), which is greater than that of cadmium (-0.40Cd +2 /Cd) and nickel (0.20Ni -2 /Ni). Hun et al observed similar results in their study (24).…”
Section: Effect Of Inlet Ph On Heavy Metal Removal Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This phenomenon is described by different redox potential of copper (Cu +2 /Cu, 0.34), which is greater than that of cadmium (-0.40Cd +2 /Cd) and nickel (0.20Ni -2 /Ni). Hun et al observed similar results in their study (24).…”
Section: Effect Of Inlet Ph On Heavy Metal Removal Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 74%
“…They observed that increasing the pH caused the decrease of heavy metal removal to such an extent that the best results in their study were observed at pH 5.4 (23). However, the study of Han et al confirmed our results (24). Similar results were also observed in another study conducted by Ahn et al on the ability of the steel manufacturing by-products as permeable reactive materials for Arsenic removal in mine tailing containment systems and described that the increase of pH increased the heavy metal removal (25).…”
Section: Effect Of Inlet Ph On Heavy Metal Removal Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The peaks at 710.98 eV and 724.50 eV correspond to the binding energy of Fe 2P3/2 and Fe 2P1/2 respectively in Fe2O3 according to the literatures [23]. As shown in Figure 1A, the spectra peaks at 712.20 eV correspond to the binding energy of Fe 2P3/2 in FeOOH [24][25][26][27]. In Figure 1B, the O 1s peak of binding energy at 530.20 eV represents the lattice oxygen in iron (III) oxide, and the peak at 531.50 eV represents the hydroxyl group linked with Fe(III) [28].…”
Section: Characterization Of Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 63%