1972
DOI: 10.2216/i0031-8884-11-1-25.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on the marine algal flora of Venezuela. IV. Botryocladia papenfussiana sp. nov. (Rhodophyceae, Rhodymeniales),

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of the increase in the number of species recognition in selected genera: Species of Hypoglossum recognized in the western Atlantic for the past 50 years: Taylor (1960). By the time of Wynne's (1986) first checklist, five species had been added to the flora: B. monoica Schnetter (1978) with a type locality near Punta de Betin, Santa Marta, on the Caribbean coast of Colombia; B. papenfussiana Ganesan et Lemus (1972) with a type locality of Peñoncito, Cumaná, Venezuela; B. shanksii E. Y. Dawson (1962) with a type locality of Puerto Limon, Atlantic coast of Costa Rica, B. spinulifera W. R. Taylor et I.…”
Section: Other Examples Of the Recognition Of Segregated Genera And Reference(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of the increase in the number of species recognition in selected genera: Species of Hypoglossum recognized in the western Atlantic for the past 50 years: Taylor (1960). By the time of Wynne's (1986) first checklist, five species had been added to the flora: B. monoica Schnetter (1978) with a type locality near Punta de Betin, Santa Marta, on the Caribbean coast of Colombia; B. papenfussiana Ganesan et Lemus (1972) with a type locality of Peñoncito, Cumaná, Venezuela; B. shanksii E. Y. Dawson (1962) with a type locality of Puerto Limon, Atlantic coast of Costa Rica, B. spinulifera W. R. Taylor et I.…”
Section: Other Examples Of the Recognition Of Segregated Genera And Reference(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the relatively less well-known floras (and even occasionally in the well-known areas), it remains possible to detect comparatively readily forms which d o not seem to be attributable to existing taxa, but for which more data are clearly required. (For examples, see: Abbott, 1970Abbott, , 1971Acleto, 1972;Aregood & Hackett, 1971;Asensi & Carralves, 1972;Baldock & Womersley, 1968;Chapman, A. R. O., 1970;Chapman, V. J., 1969;Chihara, 1968;Dawes & Mathieson, 1972;Diaz-Piferrer, 1965Earle, 1969b;Edelstein, 1972;Gaillard, 1966;Ganesan & Lemus, 1972;Giaccone, 1968;Gordon, 1970;Guiry, Irvine & Farnham, 1973;Gussarova & Petrov, 1972;Hollenberg & Abbott, 1968;HuvP, P., 1970HuvP, P., , 1972Huvt, P. & Huv6, H., 1971;Itono, 1972b;John, 1972;Joly & Alveal, 1968Joly & . Oliviera filho, 1966Kornmann, 1972a;Kraft, 1969;Krishnamurthy, 1972;Mikami, 1971aMikami, , b, 1972Pujals, 1967Pujals, , 1970Rhyne & Robinson, 1968;Searles, 1972;Taylor, W. R., 1971;Valet, 1966;Wynne, 1970a, b, c;Wynne & Edwards, 1970;…”
Section: General Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%