2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2006.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on the interaction of extended terpyridyl and triazine metal complexes with DNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(80 reference statements)
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to ethidium bromide, neither complex VR52 nor VR54 increased the relative viscosity of DNA solutions (Figure 1 c), indicating that these complexes are not metallo‐intercalators. This behaviour is consistent with previous reports on other extended Ru II –terpyridyl complexes 29…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…In contrast to ethidium bromide, neither complex VR52 nor VR54 increased the relative viscosity of DNA solutions (Figure 1 c), indicating that these complexes are not metallo‐intercalators. This behaviour is consistent with previous reports on other extended Ru II –terpyridyl complexes 29…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…On the other hand, the K B of 1 was too small to be determined by this method and can only be estimated to be <10 3 M À1 . These results compare well with binding constants determined for other Ru metallointercalators [29,[35][36][37].…”
Section: Uv/vis Titrationssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…No significant change in viscosity is observed as compared to EB‐DNA system (EB is a classical DNA intercalator; hence the viscosity of DNA solutions increases with increasing concentration of EB). This clearly rules out the possibility of binding of the metal complex to DNA by intercalation, rather supports the proposition of groove binding by the complex …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%