dwt 2018
DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2018.23107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on the influence of coagulation bath composition on the preparation of PVDF membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effects of a series of PEG 400, 1000, 1540, 2000, and 6000 on the pore structure and permeate performance of poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) (F2.6) flat-sheet membranes were investigated by evaluating average pore radius, porosity, and morphology, and the membranes reached better higher distilled flux than the PVDF membrane during the DCMD test [34]. Dayanandan et al studied the influence of the various additions of PEG (0-4 wt%) in the coagulation bath composition during the preparation of PVDF membranes, and they found that the bath-based MD membrane with 4 wt% PEG had relative superior overall performance than other membranes based on various evaluations of elongation-at-break, tensile strength, liquid entry pressure, hydrophobicity, porosity, and water flux [35]. Combined effects of poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) (PVDF-HFP) and the concentrations of the additive PEG 10000 were studied by using a statistical approach, and the optimized membrane achieved salt rejection of 99.5% in the DCMD of 0.1 M NaCl solution at 65°C [36].…”
Section: Peg Used As Pore-forming Additivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of a series of PEG 400, 1000, 1540, 2000, and 6000 on the pore structure and permeate performance of poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) (F2.6) flat-sheet membranes were investigated by evaluating average pore radius, porosity, and morphology, and the membranes reached better higher distilled flux than the PVDF membrane during the DCMD test [34]. Dayanandan et al studied the influence of the various additions of PEG (0-4 wt%) in the coagulation bath composition during the preparation of PVDF membranes, and they found that the bath-based MD membrane with 4 wt% PEG had relative superior overall performance than other membranes based on various evaluations of elongation-at-break, tensile strength, liquid entry pressure, hydrophobicity, porosity, and water flux [35]. Combined effects of poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) (PVDF-HFP) and the concentrations of the additive PEG 10000 were studied by using a statistical approach, and the optimized membrane achieved salt rejection of 99.5% in the DCMD of 0.1 M NaCl solution at 65°C [36].…”
Section: Peg Used As Pore-forming Additivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper presents a follow-up in depth investigation of the modification approach for design of antifouling ultrafiltration membranes via addition of polyelectrolyte to the coagulation bath proposed in our previous works [ 65 , 66 ]. It was established that additives to coagulation bath (salts [ 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 ], acids [ 71 , 72 ], bases [ 72 , 73 ], solvents [ 74 , 75 ], non-solvents [ 76 ]) during membrane preparation via non-solvent induced phase separation (NIPS) significantly influence the thermodynamics and kinetics of phase inversion. Additives to coagulation bath were found to adjust liquid-liquid demixing which leads to the substantial change of membrane structure and performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%