1961
DOI: 10.1017/s0007485300055309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on the dispersion and survival of Anopheles gambiae Giles in East Africa, by means of marking and release experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
133
1
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(9 reference statements)
6
133
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further avenues for the extension of host availability models are also suggested by equation [4], which outlines a simple model describing the known restriction of host dispersal (Gillies, 1961;Trape et al, 1992;Manga et al, 1993;Thompson et al, 1997), feeding cycle length Charlwood & Graves, 1987) and mortality rate (Charlwood, 1986) by host availability. This relationship is consistent with the observed dependence of adult dispersal upon the relative proximity of hosts and larval habitats (Edman et al, 1998) and the choice of oviposition sites in proximity to preferred hosts (Charlwood & Edoh, 1996;Minakawa et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further avenues for the extension of host availability models are also suggested by equation [4], which outlines a simple model describing the known restriction of host dispersal (Gillies, 1961;Trape et al, 1992;Manga et al, 1993;Thompson et al, 1997), feeding cycle length Charlwood & Graves, 1987) and mortality rate (Charlwood, 1986) by host availability. This relationship is consistent with the observed dependence of adult dispersal upon the relative proximity of hosts and larval habitats (Edman et al, 1998) and the choice of oviposition sites in proximity to preferred hosts (Charlwood & Edoh, 1996;Minakawa et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To analyze differences in survival between small and large males during each MRR study, the slopes of regression lines were compared. 27 The probability of daily survival (PDS) for marked male cohorts in each MRR experiment was estimated by fitting the exponential model 28 to log-transformed data for recaptured males against the day of collection. The antilogarithm of the slope of the regression line gives an estimate of PDS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability of daily survival was estimated by using two models: the exponential 20 and nonlinear 21 . Only field data were adjusted to models, in relation to the 7-8 days before mosquito release.…”
Section: Estimation Of Daily Survival Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%