1980
DOI: 10.1016/0005-2736(80)90387-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on the damage to Escherichia coli cell membrane caused by different rates of freeze-thawing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three successive cycles of freezing and thawing were conducted for the specific extraction of periplasmatic proteins [39]. After precipitation of the remaining cell content, the cytoplasm was extracted in the same buffer by FastPrep (Bio101) treatment including a 1:1 volume ratio of 102 nm glass beads (Sigma) at speed 5.5 for three times 20 sec.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three successive cycles of freezing and thawing were conducted for the specific extraction of periplasmatic proteins [39]. After precipitation of the remaining cell content, the cytoplasm was extracted in the same buffer by FastPrep (Bio101) treatment including a 1:1 volume ratio of 102 nm glass beads (Sigma) at speed 5.5 for three times 20 sec.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 70% of the product was released during the freeze thaw process; the rest was released upon homogenisation (see Table 1 and 2). This is an interesting observation as it shows extensive cell damage during the freeze thaw cycle which may have been made worse due to a slow freeze thaw cycle caused by the large mass of cells being freezethawed [24]. The question of the contaminant profile created by homogenisation is related to the size of debris created and the formation or release of fouling materials such as lipids as this will have a significant impact on subsequent stages such as centrifugation (smaller debris will require more effort to gain the same level of clarification), filtration (potential for foulants to blind filters and/or increase the filter area requirement) and chromatography (foulants generated at homogenisation could bind and reduce column capacity and/or physically foul the column causing an increase in pressure drop across the column).…”
Section: Resuspension and Homogenisationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Therefore, storage at 8oC reduces S. aureus viability either using a random suspension (data not shown) or 4 th degree of McFarland's scale suspension, indicating that the CFU counting method with 24 h storage will result in reduced S. aureus load. Indeed, temperature and time of storage also affects other bacteria such as Vibrio spp (SOUZU, 1980) and Clostridium sporogenes (MAH, KANG, TANG, 2009). This fact can be attributed to damage of the cytoplasmic membrane as well as to outer membrane of bacteria (MATCHES, LISTON, DANEAULT, 1971).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%