“…This has been demonstrated experimentally by Cunningham et al (1974) who reported correlations of -0-27 and -0-38 for yolk cholesterol concentration and egg production in parental and F 1 cholesterol lines and confirms the earlier work of Edwards et al (1960) and of Bartov et al (1971). Harris and Wilcox (1963), however, were unable to demonstrate such a correlation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…No changes in hatchability between the cholesterol lines were observed. INTRODUCTION The amount of cholesterol found in egg yolk varies between breeds and strains (Arroyave et al, 1957;Edwards et al, 1960;Chavous et al, 1965;Collins et ah, 1968;Turk and Barnett, 1971). Studies of the genetic variability in randombred populations (Nix, 1972;Washburn and Nix, 1974a), and in a closed population (Cunningham et al, 1974) have found a range of heritability estimates which are similar to those for egg production.…”
1. Correlated changes in egg production, hatchability, egg weight, age at sexual maturation and body weight of lines selected for divergence in yolk cholesterol were studied in two different populations.2. Divergence in yolk cholesterol resulted in a highly significant difference in percentage egg production with a negative correlation between yolk cholesterol and egg numbers. However, the calculated total daily mass of cholesterol excreted into the egg was similar in both lines.3. These results indicate that the physiological mechanism by which these populations responded to selection pressure on the concentration of cholesterol in the yolk was by changing egg numbers rather than total amount of cholesterol excreted.4. Body weights of the high and low yolk cholesterol lines of the meat type, but not of the layer-type populations, were significantly different. After four generations the line selected for low yolk cholesterol from the meat-type population weighed 80% of the line selected for high yolk cholesterol levels.5. Sexual maturity and egg weight were also significantly different between the high and low yolk cholesterol lines, but these differences could not be related to selection response. No changes in hatchability between the cholesterol lines were observed.
“…This has been demonstrated experimentally by Cunningham et al (1974) who reported correlations of -0-27 and -0-38 for yolk cholesterol concentration and egg production in parental and F 1 cholesterol lines and confirms the earlier work of Edwards et al (1960) and of Bartov et al (1971). Harris and Wilcox (1963), however, were unable to demonstrate such a correlation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…No changes in hatchability between the cholesterol lines were observed. INTRODUCTION The amount of cholesterol found in egg yolk varies between breeds and strains (Arroyave et al, 1957;Edwards et al, 1960;Chavous et al, 1965;Collins et ah, 1968;Turk and Barnett, 1971). Studies of the genetic variability in randombred populations (Nix, 1972;Washburn and Nix, 1974a), and in a closed population (Cunningham et al, 1974) have found a range of heritability estimates which are similar to those for egg production.…”
1. Correlated changes in egg production, hatchability, egg weight, age at sexual maturation and body weight of lines selected for divergence in yolk cholesterol were studied in two different populations.2. Divergence in yolk cholesterol resulted in a highly significant difference in percentage egg production with a negative correlation between yolk cholesterol and egg numbers. However, the calculated total daily mass of cholesterol excreted into the egg was similar in both lines.3. These results indicate that the physiological mechanism by which these populations responded to selection pressure on the concentration of cholesterol in the yolk was by changing egg numbers rather than total amount of cholesterol excreted.4. Body weights of the high and low yolk cholesterol lines of the meat type, but not of the layer-type populations, were significantly different. After four generations the line selected for low yolk cholesterol from the meat-type population weighed 80% of the line selected for high yolk cholesterol levels.5. Sexual maturity and egg weight were also significantly different between the high and low yolk cholesterol lines, but these differences could not be related to selection response. No changes in hatchability between the cholesterol lines were observed.
“…The fact that the greatest variation was shown to lie between daughters within dams, and the significance of the difference due to season, suggest that environmental influences contribute a greater effect than genetics on the yolk cholesterol of the egg. The results of Edwards et al (1960) clearly indicate a breed and strain difference in yolk cholesterol. Since their data also show an apparent inverse relationship with percent production of the strains tested, it is entirely feasible that much of their difference in yolk cholesterol can be explained by rate of lay.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Edwards et al (1960) have reported significant yolk cholesterol differences among eight strains of hens. In this study the yolk cholesterol of a random-bred strain of hens is reported together with a number of phenotypic correlations between yolk cholesterol and other physiological traits.…”
“…Also, the sterol content can vary significantly among eggs of different origin (Calet 1959; Edwards et al 1960;Staufer 1967). In view of these facts, and since a low sterol content is considered advantageous in human diet in order to prevent cardiovascular diseases, a new system for the determination of the number of eggs used in the production of commercially available egg pasta was studied.…”
Polyclonal antibodies have been raised against a highly purified egg yolk protein, which appears to be unaffected by thermal treatments and whose content is constant in eggs of different origin. The antibodies are able to bind specifically to the egg yolk protein and can be used for the quantification of the egg content in egg pasta. For this purpose an indirect ELISA procedure has been developed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.