1962
DOI: 10.1262/jrd1955.7.137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on the antihormone against human chorionic gonadotrophin (Anti-HCG) in cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

1979
1979
1979
1979

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An explanation of the reduction in ovarian response to repeat PMSG treatments in the present, and other, reports is difficult in view of findings which indicate that antibodies to PMSG are unlikely to be formed when normal levels of PMSG are administered to cattle (Nakahara, Yamauchi, Kataoka & Kaneda, 1964;Schams et al, 1978) or sheep (Clarke, 1973 (Papkoff, 1978 The observation that there was no difference in response according to the day on which PMSG was injected, when treatment was initiated between Days 9 and 12 after oestrus, supports previous findings (Newcomb & Rowson, 1976;Greve, 1976) that when PMSG is injected in the mid-luteal phase, after Day 8, there is no significant effect of day of treatment on response.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…An explanation of the reduction in ovarian response to repeat PMSG treatments in the present, and other, reports is difficult in view of findings which indicate that antibodies to PMSG are unlikely to be formed when normal levels of PMSG are administered to cattle (Nakahara, Yamauchi, Kataoka & Kaneda, 1964;Schams et al, 1978) or sheep (Clarke, 1973 (Papkoff, 1978 The observation that there was no difference in response according to the day on which PMSG was injected, when treatment was initiated between Days 9 and 12 after oestrus, supports previous findings (Newcomb & Rowson, 1976;Greve, 1976) that when PMSG is injected in the mid-luteal phase, after Day 8, there is no significant effect of day of treatment on response.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%